Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘love’

Five of Pentacles Emotion: raw awakening and uncomfortable reality. Five glowing pentacles lie scattered on the ground as a young couple experiences their first physical union. The man’s face shows surprised pleasure; the woman’s face shows shock and discomfort as illusions shatter. A strong oak tree stands firm amid the emotional shift. Colors: deep crimsons, shadowed blues, and faint hopeful golds.
Five of Pentacles This card is about the raw, sometimes uncomfortable reality of first physical union. Sex is not what either person expected, and illusions about romance can shatter. It brings both pleasure and a new awareness of the body’s needs. The Five invites you to be gentle with yourself and your partner as you learn to be fully embodied together.
Male experience: You may feel surprised by how real and grounding the experience feels.
Female experience: You may feel a mix of pleasure and discomfort as the physical side of love becomes very real.

Read Full Post »

Degree 10 — Embodied Sovereignty

Living the Current Without the Scaffold

The first degrees taught us how to find ourselves.

The middle degrees taught us how to meet others without losing ourselves.

Degree 9 taught us how to use influence without diminishing others.

Degree 10 asks the final question:

What does assertiveness look like when I no longer have to think about being assertive?

The answer is not greater force.

It is presence.


The Central Principle

Assertiveness is not a performance of strength. It is the natural expression of a person who knows where they stand.

Such a person doesn’t need to dominate.

They don’t need to disappear.

They don’t need to constantly defend their identity.

They don’t need to win every disagreement.

They don’t need to prove their worth.

They can simply meet reality as it arrives.

And respond.


The Final Integration

At Degree 10, the apparent opposites begin functioning together:

Strength + gentleness

Boundary + openness

Independence + relationship

Listening + speaking

Certainty + curiosity

Authority + humility

Action + rest

Persistence + release

None needs to eliminate the other.

This is the practical meaning of the OAK principle of loving embrace.


The Mature Assertive Person

A mature assertive person can say:

“I don’t know.”

without becoming powerless.

“I was wrong.”

without collapsing.

“I need help.”

without feeling inferior.

“No.”

without hostility.

“Yes.”

without resentment.

“I disagree.”

without making an enemy.

“You’re right.”

without experiencing defeat.

“I care about you.”

without surrendering themselves.

“I care about myself.”

without becoming selfish.

This is integrated power.


The Body Knows Before the Argument

One of the deepest developments of the course is moving assertiveness out of the purely intellectual realm.

The person begins noticing:

  • tightening,
  • shrinking,
  • rushing,
  • freezing,
  • irritation,
  • exhaustion,
  • openness,
  • ease,
  • groundedness.

These aren’t automatically instructions.

They are information.

The mature response isn’t:

“My body says no, therefore no.”

Nor:

“My body is emotional, therefore irrelevant.”

Instead:

“Something in me is responding. Let me listen before I choose.”

That is embodied discernment.


The Ten-Degree Spiral

Now the entire course can be seen as one recursive movement:

1. Awareness

I notice myself.

2. Voice

I express myself.

3. Boundary

I define what is mine.

4. Choice

I act deliberately.

5. Responsibility

I own my consequences.

6. Reciprocity

I recognize the other.

7. Mutuality

We can both remain sovereign.

8. Resilience

Pressure does not determine me.

9. Leadership

My power can increase yours.

10. Embodiment

I no longer need the ladder to remember who I am.

And then something beautiful happens.

Degree 10 loops back into Degree 1.

Because awareness never ends.

Every new relationship, situation, conflict, opportunity, or transition presents another moment of:

Notice.

The spiral begins again at a deeper level.


The Final Assertiveness Formula

If we wanted to reduce the entire course to one sentence:

Know what is true for you, communicate it honestly, remain open to what is true for others, and choose your actions without surrendering your sovereignty.

Everything else is elaboration.


The Degree 10 Practice — The Ordinary Day

This final practice is intentionally different.

For one day:

Don’t practice assertiveness.

Don’t try to perform the techniques.

Don’t monitor yourself constantly.

Don’t analyze every interaction.

Simply move through the day and notice:

  • Where does my attention naturally go?
  • What do I genuinely want?
  • What am I saying yes to?
  • What am I saying no to?
  • Where do I become smaller?
  • Where do I become unnecessarily forceful?
  • Where does another person’s presence change me?
  • Where can I remain open without abandoning myself?

At the end of the day, ask only:

“Where did I feel most like myself?”

And:

“Where did I leave myself?”

No elaborate analysis.

Just notice.


The Practice of Clean Repair

There is one final skill that belongs here because no human being gets assertiveness right all the time.

Repair.

Sometimes you will:

  • speak too harshly,
  • fail to speak soon enough,
  • misunderstand,
  • overreact,
  • violate someone else’s boundary,
  • abandon your own,
  • become defensive,
  • attempt to control.

Embodied sovereignty doesn’t require perfection.

It requires return.

A clean repair sounds like:

“I handled that badly.”

“I was too forceful.”

“I didn’t listen.”

“I let my boundary disappear.”

“I’m sorry.”

“Here’s what I’ll do differently.”

Then you actually do it.

No self-punishment.

No elaborate justification.

No demand that the other person immediately forgive you.

Repair restores the circuit.


The Final Shadow

Even Degree 10 has a distortion.

It is spiritualized passivity.

A person can become so enamored with acceptance, harmony, and “flow” that they stop making difficult choices.

They tell themselves:

“I’m just allowing the current.”

while avoiding:

  • confrontation,
  • responsibility,
  • boundaries,
  • leadership,
  • necessary endings,
  • difficult truths.

That isn’t embodied sovereignty.

Sometimes the current says:

Speak.

Sometimes:

Stay.

Sometimes:

Leave.

Sometimes:

Apologize.

Sometimes:

Fight for something worth protecting.

Sometimes:

Let it go.

The mature person doesn’t worship any particular response.

They remain available to reality.


The Final Test

Degree 10 isn’t measured by how peaceful you are.

It’s measured by how freely you can respond.

Can you be firm without hatred?

Can you be soft without submission?

Can you be powerful without domination?

Can you be vulnerable without losing yourself?

Can you remain alone without becoming isolated?

Can you belong without becoming dependent?

Can you lead without needing followers?

Can you release something without calling it failure?

Can you change without betraying yourself?

Can you remain yourself while genuinely allowing yourself to change?

If yes, the course has reached its purpose.


The OAK Translation

The original metaphysical framework began with polarity.

Expansion.

Containment.

Exchange.

Integration.

At Degree 10, those aren’t merely concepts.

They have become ordinary human capacities.

You speak.

You listen.

You act.

You receive.

You meet.

You separate.

You create.

You release.

And none of these movements needs to defeat the others.

The tank current becomes a useful metaphor for the integrated person:

Energy moves. Experience moves. Relationships move. Life moves.

You don’t have to freeze yourself to remain sovereign.

You don’t have to control the current.

You learn to participate consciously in it.


The Final Threshold

And here I think the course should deliberately resist the temptation to claim that someone has become “fully enlightened,” “perfectly assertive,” or permanently complete.

There is no final human state.

There is simply increasing capacity to return.

When we lose ourselves:

return.

When we become rigid:

soften.

When we disappear:

stand up.

When we dominate:

listen.

When we become afraid:

breathe and look again.

When the relationship breaks:

repair if possible.

When it must end:

release cleanly.

When something new appears:

begin again.


The Ten Degrees in One Breath

Notice yourself.

Find your voice.

Establish your boundaries.

Choose deliberately.

Take responsibility.

Meet the other.

Build reciprocity.

Remain sovereign under pressure.

Use power to increase agency.

Then let the technique become you.

That is Degree 10.

And that gives us something I think is particularly important for the course as a whole:

The goal of assertiveness isn’t to produce harder people.

It is to produce more fully present people.

People who can say yes freely.

People who can say no cleanly.

People who can love without disappearing.

People who can disagree without creating enemies.

People who can wield power without needing domination.

People who can stand alone without believing they must stand against everyone else.

And eventually, perhaps, people who don’t think of themselves as “assertive” at all.

They are simply there.

The scaffolding has done its work.

The course can finally become ordinary life.

Read Full Post »

Degree 8 — Assertiveness Under Pressure

Staying Sovereign When the Field Becomes Difficult

Degree 7 taught reciprocal power: I can remain myself while allowing you to remain yourself.

Degree 8 asks the harder question:

Can I still do that when the other person is angry, manipulative, frightened, dismissive, or emotionally intense?

This is where assertiveness becomes resilient.

The goal isn’t to remain calm at all costs. It is to remain self-directed while experiencing pressure.


The Central Principle

Pressure does not automatically require movement.

Someone can become angry.

Someone can disagree.

Someone can cry.

Someone can accuse you.

Someone can withdraw.

Someone can demand an immediate answer.

None of those events, by themselves, determine what you must do.

Your first responsibility is to remain connected to your own perception.

“Something is happening in the other person. I don’t have to become it.”

That is Degree 8 sovereignty.


The Three-Part Pressure Response

When pressure rises, use:

1. Ground

Before responding, reconnect with your physical experience.

Feet.

Breath.

Posture.

Voice.

Notice:

“What am I actually experiencing right now?”

This interrupts automatic submission or counterattack.

2. Separate

Distinguish:

What happened
from
what I’m being told it means.

For example:

“You don’t care about me.”

The observable event might simply be:

“I said no to the request.”

The accusation is interpretation.

Don’t automatically argue with the interpretation.

Return to reality.

3. Choose

Ask:

“What response serves my actual values and boundaries?”

Then act.


The Pressure Ladder

Pressure often escalates through recognizable stages:

Discomfort → Persuasion → Emotional Pressure → Manipulation → Threat → Coercion

Assertiveness should become clearer as pressure increases, not more complicated.

At low pressure:

“I’d rather do something else.”

At moderate pressure:

“I’ve already answered.”

At repeated pressure:

“I’m not discussing this further.”

At coercion:

“No. I’m leaving this situation.”

The key is that explanation decreases as pressure increases.


The Broken-Record Skill

One of the simplest and most powerful assertiveness tools is repetition without escalation.

Person:

“Come on. Just this once.”

You:

“No, I’m not doing that.”

Person:

“Why not?”

“Because I’m not doing that.”

Person:

“You’re being ridiculous.”

“You may feel that way. I’m still not doing it.”

No new argument.

No defensive essay.

No counterattack.

Just the same boundary.

This is sometimes called the broken-record technique.

It protects the boundary from being gradually negotiated away through exhaustion.


Emotional Weather Is Not Command

This deserves its own lesson.

Other people’s emotions are real.

They deserve consideration.

But emotions are not automatically instructions.

Someone else’s:

  • anger,
  • disappointment,
  • anxiety,
  • urgency,
  • sadness,
  • enthusiasm,

can be acknowledged without being obeyed.

“I can care about your feeling without surrendering my decision.”

That single distinction could transform the lives of many people who have learned to equate kindness with compliance.


The Counterattack Trap

There is an equally important danger on the other side.

When people discover assertiveness, they sometimes overshoot.

They move from:

“I must keep everyone happy.”

to:

“Nobody gets to tell me anything.”

That’s not sovereignty.

That’s defensive isolation.

Degree 8 therefore teaches:

Resistance is not automatically strength.

Sometimes the other person has useful information.

Sometimes our boundary is poorly chosen.

Sometimes we misunderstood.

Sometimes we genuinely owe an apology.

Assertiveness includes the capacity to say:

“You’re right. I hadn’t considered that.”

without experiencing the admission as defeat.


The Power of the Pause

One of the most important tools in the entire course:

You are allowed to take time.

Useful phrases:

“Let me think about that.”

“I don’t want to answer right now.”

“I’ll get back to you.”

“I need some time before I decide.”

“I’m not comfortable making that decision under pressure.”

The pause restores choice.

And that makes it one of the simplest forms of personal sovereignty.


Recognizing Coercive Dynamics

Degree 8 should explicitly teach the difference between conflict and coercion.

Conflict means:

“We want different things.”

Coercion means:

“You are not permitted to freely choose.”

Warning signs include:

  • threats for refusing
  • intimidation
  • deliberate isolation
  • punishment for boundaries
  • relentless pressure after a clear no
  • withholding essential resources to force compliance
  • deliberately creating fear
  • exploiting someone’s dependency
  • sexual pressure or lack of consent

At that point, the goal isn’t better communication.

The goal is safety, distance, support, and restoration of choice.

That distinction makes the course considerably more practical.


The Degree 8 Practice: The Pressure Journal

For one week, record one moment each day when you felt pressured.

Write four things:

1. What happened?

Only observable facts.

2. What did I feel?

Fear, anger, guilt, urgency, confusion, etc.

3. What did I believe I had to do?

This often reveals the hidden script.

4. What did I actually choose?

No self-judgment.

The purpose is to discover where pressure automatically becomes obedience, avoidance, or counterattack.


The OAK Translation

This is another place where the underlying framework becomes remarkably useful as metaphor.

Degree 7 established the embrace:

You ↔ Me

Degree 8 introduces pressure within the embrace.

The mistake is assuming that tension means the system is broken.

Sometimes tension is simply information.

But healthy containment has a limit.

If pressure becomes destructive, the appropriate response isn’t to hold it forever in the name of “loving embrace.”

Sometimes the system must open, step back, release, or leave.

That is an important refinement to the OAK principle:

Loving containment does not mean tolerating harm.

And:

Integration never requires surrendering consent or sovereignty.


Degree 8 Mastery

You are becoming proficient when:

  • You can remain present while someone is angry.
  • You don’t automatically defend yourself against every accusation.
  • You can distinguish facts from interpretations.
  • You can pause instead of reacting.
  • You can repeat a boundary without escalating.
  • You can tolerate another person’s disappointment.
  • You can recognize manipulation without becoming paranoid.
  • You can admit when you’re wrong.
  • You know when dialogue is useful and when distance is wiser.
  • You don’t confuse compassion with compliance.

The deepest shift is this:

Pressure becomes something you can experience without automatically obeying.

That is the beginning of genuine resilience.

And Degree 8 prepares us beautifully for Degree 9, where assertiveness moves beyond surviving difficult interactions into leadership, influence, and stewardship without domination.

Read Full Post »

Degree 5 — The Clean Ask

Influence without manipulation

Purpose:
To teach the difference between assertive influence and coercive influence.

An assertive person isn’t merely someone who can say no. They must also be able to say:

“Yes, this is what I want.”

And then tolerate the possibility that the answer may be no.


1. The Core Movement

The Degree 5 circuit is:

Desire → Clarify → Ask → Receive

I recognize what I want.

I make the request clear.

I give the other person room to answer.

Then I receive their answer without secretly turning the request into a demand.

This completes an important reciprocal loop.


2. The OAK Translation

Expansion:
“I have something I want to bring into the field.”

Containment:
“I allow you to receive it and respond freely.”

Exchange:
“We discover what can actually be created between us.”

The fundamental rule:

A request opens a door. It does not remove the other person’s freedom to walk through it.


3. The Difference Between Wanting and Entitlement

This is one of the most important distinctions in the course.

You are allowed to want almost anything.

That doesn’t mean you’re entitled to receive it.

You can want:

  • someone’s time
  • affection
  • assistance
  • recognition
  • a particular outcome
  • a change in behavior
  • an opportunity

But the other person retains sovereignty.

So:

“I want this.”

is fundamentally different from:

“You owe me this.”

Assertiveness can hold enormous desire without converting desire into entitlement.


4. The Anatomy of a Clean Ask

A good request contains four elements:

1. The desired action

“Would you be willing to…”

2. The relevant context

“Because…”

3. The specific outcome

“I’d like…”

4. Freedom to answer

“If not, I understand.”

For example:

“Would you be willing to look over this draft tonight? I’d like another set of eyes before I finish it. If you don’t have time, that’s okay.”

Notice how little pressure is required.


5. Don’t Make Them Guess

Indirect communication often creates unnecessary friction.

Instead of:

“I guess nobody has time for me.”

try:

“I’d like some company tonight. Are you available?”

Instead of:

“It would be nice if somebody helped around here.”

try:

“Could you handle the dishes tonight?”

Instead of:

“You never tell me what you think.”

try:

“I’d really like your honest opinion about this.”

The cleaner the request, the less emotional decoding is required.


6. Ask Once Before Escalating

A clean request deserves a clean answer.

If the answer is no, don’t immediately convert the request into pressure.

Instead:

“Okay. Is there another time that would work?”

That is negotiation.

But:

“If you cared about me, you’d do it.”

is coercion.

The difference is enormous.


7. Persuasion Without Manipulation

Persuasion itself is not bad.

Healthy persuasion offers information, reasons, evidence, or possibilities.

Manipulation attempts to bypass someone’s freedom to choose.

A useful test:

“Am I trying to help them decide, or trying to prevent them from deciding?”

Healthy persuasion:

“Here’s why I think this would work.”

Manipulation:

“I’m going to make you feel bad until you agree.”

The OAK principle gives us a very clean rule:

Influence may change someone’s mind. It must not attempt to remove their mind.


8. The Power of a Real No

The clean ask requires learning to receive refusal.

Someone says:

“No.”

The mature response can simply be:

“Okay. Thanks for telling me.”

That doesn’t mean you like the answer.

It means you recognize reality.

And sometimes the no contains information:

“No, but I can do this instead.”

Now the exchange has become creative.


9. When the Answer Is No

Degree 5 introduces a decision tree:

No → Accept?

If yes, accept.

No → Negotiate?

If both parties are willing, negotiate.

No → Change your request?

Perhaps.

No → Change your own participation?

Perhaps.

No → Leave the arrangement?

Sometimes.

The crucial insight:

Someone’s refusal doesn’t end your agency.

You still have choices.


10. Asking for Change

One of the most useful assertive formulas is:

When X happens, I experience Y, and I would like Z.

For example:

“When meetings run over the scheduled time, I become pressed for the rest of the day. I’d like us to end at the agreed time.”

Or:

“When plans change at the last minute, I get frustrated. I’d like more notice when possible.”

It doesn’t accuse.

It doesn’t demand mind-reading.

It identifies an observable situation and makes a concrete request.


11. The Hidden Trap: Asking for Permission to Exist

There is an opposite problem too.

Sometimes people make perfectly reasonable requests as though they’re asking permission to have needs.

“I’m sorry, but would it maybe possibly be okay if…”

Degree 5 begins removing unnecessary apology.

Try:

“I’d like…”

“I need…”

“Would you be willing to…”

“I’d prefer…”

A request doesn’t become more respectful because you make yourself smaller.


12. The Practice: Ten Clean Asks

Over the next week, make ten small, genuine requests.

They can be trivial.

“Could you pass that to me?”

“Would you mind moving this?”

“I’d like to eat somewhere quieter.”

“Can we start at seven?”

“Could you give me your opinion?”

Track only three things:

What did I ask for?

Did I allow a genuine answer?

What did I do with the answer?

This teaches something Degree 1–4 could not:

You can survive wanting something.

And you can survive not getting it.


13. The Advanced Practice: Ask Without Attachment

Eventually try making a request where the outcome genuinely matters to you.

Before speaking, recognize:

“I strongly want yes.”

Then consciously add:

“And they remain free to say no.”

That little internal movement is profound.

You are not suppressing desire.

You’re containing it without weaponizing it.

That is the OAK embrace in miniature.


14. The Shadow of Degree 5

Again, two opposite distortions emerge.

The Manipulator

“I want it, therefore I must get you to give it to me.”

Desire becomes control.

The Passive Self

“You might say no, so I won’t ask.”

Fear becomes invisibility.

The assertive middle is:

“I will let you know what I want, and I will let you remain free.”

That is clean influence.


15. The Degree 5 Threshold

Something changes when the student discovers they can ask directly.

They no longer have to:

hint.

withdraw.

sulk.

pressure.

over-explain.

pretend not to care.

or manipulate.

They can simply say:

“This is what I’d like.”

And then listen.

That is a major increase in personal power because desire no longer requires control.


16. Degree 5 Completion Marker

The student is moving toward Degree 6 when they can increasingly:

  • state wants directly
  • make specific requests
  • distinguish desire from entitlement
  • accept a genuine no
  • negotiate without coercion
  • persuade without manipulating
  • ask for behavioral change clearly
  • tolerate uncertainty after asking
  • avoid shrinking themselves through excessive apology
  • maintain agency even when refused

The emerging capability is:

I can move outward into the world without violating another person’s freedom.

And now we have a beautiful midpoint emerging:

Degree 1 — I exist.
Degree 2 — I protect my existence.
Degree 3 — I meet another person without disappearing.
Degree 4 — I remain myself under emotional pressure.
Degree 5 — I express desire without controlling the other.

Degree 6 can therefore take the next natural step:

What happens when clean requests aren’t enough—when we have competing interests, limited resources, real stakes, and something genuinely has to be worked out?

That is where we enter negotiation, compromise, reciprocity, and the art of creating a result that neither person could have produced alone.

Read Full Post »

Degree 4 — The Emotional Current

Staying present when the pressure rises

Purpose:
To develop the ability to experience strong emotion without automatically becoming controlled by it—or using it to control someone else.

Degree 4 teaches:

Emotion is information, not command.


1. The Core Movement

The Degree 4 circuit is:

Feel → Pause → Discern → Respond

Something happens.

Emotion rises.

You allow the experience without immediately acting from it.

Then you determine what the emotion is actually telling you.

Only afterward do you choose your response.

This is the difference between emotional suppression and emotional sovereignty.


2. The OAK Translation

Degree 4 brings the relational field inward.

Expansion:
“I feel something strongly.”

Containment:
“I can hold the feeling without needing to discharge it immediately.”

Transformation:
“I can discover what the feeling is telling me.”

Return:
“I can bring that information into the relationship consciously.”

The emotion isn’t the enemy.

It is energy carrying information.


3. Feeling Is Not the Same as Fact

This distinction is foundational.

“I feel ignored.”

is a valid emotional experience.

It does not automatically prove:

“You intentionally ignored me.”

Likewise:

“I feel threatened.”

doesn’t automatically establish:

“You are dangerous.”

The feeling deserves attention.

The interpretation deserves examination.

A useful question is:

“What do I know, and what am I adding?”


4. The Four Layers of an Emotional Event

When something hits hard, separate:

1. Event

What actually happened?

2. Interpretation

What meaning did I immediately assign to it?

3. Emotion

What am I feeling?

4. Need or value

What matters to me underneath the emotion?

Example:

Event:
“They canceled our plans.”

Interpretation:
“I don’t matter to them.”

Emotion:
Hurt, anger.

Underlying value:
Reliability and consideration.

Now the conversation becomes much cleaner:

“When our plans were canceled at the last minute, I felt hurt. Reliability matters to me. Can we talk about what happened?”

That is assertiveness rather than accusation.


5. The Pressure Curve

Emotional activation often follows a recognizable progression:

Signal → Activation → Escalation → Peak → Release → Integration

The crucial intervention point is before the peak.

You don’t need to eliminate emotion.

You need enough awareness to recognize:

“I’m getting too activated to have a useful conversation.”

Then you can pause.


6. The Assertive Pause

A pause isn’t avoidance when it has a return.

Instead of:

“Forget it!”

try:

“I’m getting too upset to talk about this well. I need some time, and I’ll come back to it.”

That sentence contains three things:

Recognition.

Boundary.

Commitment to return.

This is mature containment.


7. Anger as Information

Anger often contains a boundary signal.

But anger doesn’t tell you automatically what to do.

It may indicate:

  • something important was violated
  • you feel powerless
  • you feel unseen
  • you’ve tolerated too much
  • an expectation was violated
  • you are actually frightened
  • you are exhausted

So instead of:

“I’m angry, therefore attack.”

Degree 4 teaches:

“I’m angry. What is the anger protecting?”

Sometimes the answer is a legitimate boundary.

Sometimes it is an old wound.

Sometimes it is both.


8. Fear as Information

Fear deserves the same distinction.

Sometimes fear says:

Danger.

Sometimes it says:

Uncertainty.

Sometimes it says:

This resembles something painful from the past.

Those are very different situations.

Assertiveness requires enough discernment to distinguish them.

And there is an important safety principle here:

When genuine danger is present, the goal is not better communication. The goal is safety.

Leaving, seeking help, creating distance, or getting support can be more assertive than attempting to negotiate with someone who is unsafe.


9. Guilt and Obligation

This is one of the most important Degree 4 lessons.

Feeling guilty does not prove you did something wrong.

Sometimes guilt means:

“I violated my values.”

Sometimes it means:

“Someone is disappointed that I stopped complying.”

Those are not the same thing.

Ask:

“Did I violate a value, or did I violate someone’s expectation?”

That single distinction can radically change someone’s relationship with guilt.


10. Emotional Manipulation

Degree 4 also teaches students to recognize emotional pressure without immediately labeling every difficult interaction as manipulation.

Look for patterns such as:

  • guilt used to obtain compliance
  • fear used to control behavior
  • affection repeatedly withdrawn as punishment
  • deliberate confusion
  • threats disguised as requests
  • persistent pressure after a clear no
  • making someone responsible for another person’s emotional stability

The response isn’t necessarily confrontation.

Often it is simply:

Notice → name internally → maintain boundary → choose appropriate distance.


11. The Difference Between Empathy and Absorption

Empathy says:

“I can feel or understand something of what you’re experiencing.”

Absorption says:

“Your emotional state has become my responsibility.”

Those are radically different.

A sovereign response can be:

“I understand that you’re upset.”

without becoming:

“Therefore I must give you what you want.”

This is one of the most useful relational boundaries in the entire course.


12. The Degree 4 Practice

For one week, when you notice a strong emotional reaction, don’t immediately try to fix it.

Write four short lines:

What happened?
What did I tell myself it meant?
What am I feeling?
What matters underneath it?

Then add:

“What response would represent me well?”

Not:

“What response would make the emotion disappear?”

That distinction is everything.


13. The Live Practice

Choose one mildly uncomfortable interaction.

When activation appears:

Stop.

Feel your feet.

Take one slow breath.

Notice the emotion.

Then say less than you normally would.

For example:

“I’m upset, and I don’t want to answer too quickly.”

Or:

“I need a minute to think about that.”

Or:

“I understand what you’re saying. I need some time before I respond.”

The student learns that the pause itself is a form of power.


14. The Shadow of Degree 4

There are two opposite failures.

Emotional Explosion

“I feel it, therefore I must act it.”

Emotion becomes weapon.

Emotional Suppression

“I must remain calm, therefore I must not feel it.”

Emotion disappears underground.

Neither is sovereignty.

The OAK middle:

Feel completely. Act deliberately.


15. The Degree 4 Threshold

Eventually the student notices:

Someone can be angry with them.

They can feel guilt.

Their body can become activated.

They can feel the urge to defend themselves.

And still—

they don’t have to react.

The space between feeling and action becomes larger.

That space is freedom.


16. Degree 4 Completion Marker

The student is moving toward Degree 5 when they can increasingly:

  • distinguish feelings from interpretations
  • identify emotions without being ruled by them
  • recognize legitimate boundary signals
  • tolerate another person’s emotional reaction
  • pause before responding under pressure
  • distinguish guilt from actual wrongdoing
  • empathize without absorbing responsibility
  • recognize coercive emotional patterns
  • repair after emotional mistakes
  • prioritize safety when genuine danger exists

The emerging capability is:

I can feel deeply without surrendering my center.

And the ladder is becoming very coherent:

Degree 1 — I exist.
Degree 2 — I can protect my existence.
Degree 3 — I can meet another person without disappearing.
Degree 4 — I can remain myself when emotion enters the field.

That naturally prepares Degree 5.

Because once a person can remain centered through emotional pressure, we can finally examine one of the most powerful forms of relational pressure:

influence.

Not manipulation. Not domination.

How do I ask for what I want, persuade honestly, advocate for myself, and create movement without violating another person’s sovereignty?

Read Full Post »

Degree 3 — The Meeting of Realities

Disagreement without domination or disappearance

Purpose:
To learn that disagreement does not mean somebody has to win.

The goal isn’t agreement.

The goal is accurate contact.


1. The Core Movement

The Degree 3 circuit is:

State → Listen → Differentiate → Negotiate

I state my reality.

I genuinely hear yours.

I distinguish what is actually incompatible from what merely feels different.

Then we discover whether there is a workable exchange.

This is the first degree where both sparks must remain fully present.


2. The OAK Translation

The polarity becomes beautifully simple:

Expansion:
“This is my reality.”

Containment:
“I can make room for your reality without losing mine.”

Reciprocal exchange:
“Let’s discover what becomes possible between them.”

This is the practical meaning of:

Duality is not conflict.

It doesn’t mean disagreement disappears.

It means disagreement becomes information about the relationship between two realities.


3. The Three Things People Confuse

When disagreement appears, distinguish:

Difference

“I prefer mornings. You prefer evenings.”

Nothing is wrong.

Conflict

“We both need the same resource at the same time.”

Something genuinely needs solving.

Violation

“You are demanding something I have already said I will not consent to.”

That is not a negotiation problem.

It is a boundary problem.

This distinction is crucial.

Not everything should be negotiated.


4. The First Skill: Speak From Yourself

Assertiveness becomes cleaner when language describes your position rather than diagnosing the other person.

Instead of:

“You’re selfish.”

Try:

“I don’t want to take that responsibility on.”

Instead of:

“You never listen.”

Try:

“I don’t feel heard when I get interrupted.”

Instead of:

“You’re trying to control me.”

Try:

“I’m not comfortable with that arrangement.”

This doesn’t weaken the message.

It makes it harder to derail.


5. The Second Skill: Listen Without Surrender

Listening is not agreement.

This needs to be taught explicitly.

You can say:

“I understand why you see it that way.”

without saying:

“You’re right.”

You can accurately summarize someone’s position while maintaining your own.

A useful formula:

“I hear that you want X because Y. I still want Z.”

For example:

“I understand that you want me to come tonight because you were hoping we’d spend time together. I’m still staying home tonight.”

That’s extraordinarily powerful.

Understanding does not require surrender.


6. The Third Skill: Find the Actual Collision

People frequently fight over the surface issue while the real issue is underneath.

Someone says:

“You never help.”

But perhaps what they need is:

“I want to know I can rely on you.”

Someone says:

“You don’t care.”

Perhaps the actual need is:

“I want reassurance.”

Someone says:

“You’re controlling me.”

Perhaps the underlying issue is:

“I need autonomy.”

Degree 3 teaches the student to ask:

“What are we actually trying to protect here?”

That question often lowers unnecessary friction immediately.


7. The Negotiation Ladder

When both positions matter, move through four levels.

Level 1 — Clarify

“What exactly are you asking for?”

Level 2 — Identify needs

“What makes that important to you?”

Level 3 — Identify constraints

“What can’t either of us realistically give?”

Level 4 — Generate options

“What could work for both of us?”

Notice what isn’t here:

Who is right?

That question often arrives too early.


8. The OAK Principle of the Third Option

Two opposing positions can sometimes produce a third possibility neither person initially saw.

You want X.

They want Y.

Instead of:

X vs. Y

ask:

“What becomes possible if we stop treating X and Y as the only choices?”

That is the first practical appearance of emergence in the course.

The relationship itself becomes a creative medium.


9. When There Is No Third Option

This is equally important.

Sometimes there simply isn’t a mutually satisfying solution.

You want something.

They want its opposite.

Neither can reasonably surrender.

Then assertiveness becomes:

“We may genuinely disagree.”

Possible outcomes include:

  • compromise
  • alternating
  • postponement
  • separate choices
  • accepting the difference
  • ending the arrangement
  • ending the relationship

A mature assertive person doesn’t manufacture harmony just to avoid discomfort.

Some differences are meant to remain differences.


10. The Shadow of Degree 3

There are two opposite failures.

The Dominator

“My reality is reality.”

They turn disagreement into conquest.

The Disappearing Self

“Your reality is more important than mine.”

They turn harmony into self-erasure.

The OAK middle path is:

“Both realities are real. Now let’s see what they can generate together.”

That is neither domination nor submission.

It is reciprocity.


11. The Practice: One Real Conversation

During the week, choose one low-to-moderate disagreement.

Practice this sequence:

1. State:

“What I want is…”

2. Listen:

“What I’m hearing you want is…”

3. Confirm:

“Did I understand that correctly?”

4. Differentiate:

“Where we differ is…”

5. Explore:

“Is there another way we could approach this?”

Then stop.

Don’t force a solution.

The exercise is learning to remain present inside difference.


12. The Micro-Skill: The Pause

One of the most useful assertiveness skills is almost invisible.

When somebody says something provocative:

Don’t answer immediately.

Breathe.

Feel your body.

Let the first reactive impulse pass.

Then speak.

That tiny interval creates sovereignty between stimulus and response.

It is where choice enters.


13. The Degree 3 Threshold

Eventually the student experiences something remarkable:

Someone disagrees.

And nothing catastrophic happens.

They don’t have to convince them.

They don’t have to surrender.

They don’t have to become angry.

They don’t have to fix the relationship immediately.

They can simply remain there.

“You see it differently. I see it differently. We are still here.”

That is a significant expansion of relational capacity.


14. Degree 3 Completion Marker

The student is moving toward Degree 4 when they can increasingly:

  • disagree without becoming hostile
  • listen without automatically agreeing
  • state their position without attacking
  • identify the actual issue beneath an argument
  • negotiate without abandoning core boundaries
  • tolerate unresolved disagreement
  • recognize when negotiation is inappropriate
  • pause before reacting
  • search for emergent solutions without demanding one

The emerging capability is:

I can remain myself while genuinely meeting another person.

And now the ladder has a very clean developmental progression:

Degree 1 — I exist.
Degree 2 — I can protect my existence.
Degree 3 — I can meet another existence without either of us disappearing.

Which means Degree 4 can take us somewhere deeper:

What happens when the relationship itself becomes emotionally charged?

That’s where we begin working with emotion, pressure, manipulation, guilt, anger, fear, and the ability to stay sovereign when the nervous system wants to take over.

Read Full Post »

Module 1 – Presence and the Living Now An entry-level introduction to the living current

1. The Only Time That Exists

The past is already gone. The future has not yet arrived. The only place where life can actually be lived, felt, chosen, and changed is right here, in this moment.

Most of us spend large parts of our days somewhere else—replaying old conversations, worrying about what might happen, or scrolling through other people’s lives. When we do that, we miss the only real power we have.

Power, joy, clarity, and change are available only in the present. Everything else is memory or imagination.

Practice Several times today, pause for ten seconds. Feel your feet on the ground or your body in the chair. Notice one simple thing that is happening right now—the temperature of the air, a sound, the sensation of breathing. That is the present. It is always here.

2. Your Unique Life

No one else has ever lived, or will ever live, the exact life you are living. Your body, your history, your temperament, and the particular mix of strengths and limits you carry are yours alone.

This uniqueness is not a problem to be fixed. It is the ground from which everything real grows. Trying to live someone else’s life, or waiting for permission to live your own, only drains energy.

The present moment is the place where you meet your actual life—not the life you think you should have, not the life others expect, but the one that is actually here.

Practice Write down three simple facts about your life that are true only for you (for example: “I need quiet in the morning,” “My body works best when I move every day,” “I care deeply about ___”). Read them once. Let them be enough.

3. Life Is Short and Sacred

Because life is limited, it is precious. Treating it as endless or as a problem to be solved later is a quiet form of disrespect.

Three practical foundations support a life that feels sacred rather than wasted:

  • Care for the body so it can carry you.
  • Build quiet confidence through small, real efforts rather than waiting for external approval.
  • Listen for your own inner sense of what is true for you, and act from that rather than from constant second-guessing.

These are not spiritual achievements. They are ordinary acts of respect for a short and valuable life.

Practice Choose one small physical act of care today (drink water, stretch, go outside, rest when tired). Do it deliberately, as a way of saying “this life matters.”

4. Happiness Is Grown, Not Found

Lasting happiness does not arrive as a gift from possessions, other people, or perfect circumstances. It grows from the quiet satisfaction of making real effort and seeing the results of that effort—however small.

When results are missing, it is useful information, not a personal failure. Either more effort is needed, or a different direction is needed. Both are workable.

Taking good things for granted slowly empties them of joy. Noticing them restores it.

Practice At the end of the day, write down one thing you actually did (not something you planned or hoped). Notice how it feels to acknowledge real action rather than ideals.

5. Celebration as a Way of Meeting Life

Celebration does not mean pretending everything is pleasant. It means meeting whatever is actually happening—ease or difficulty, success or struggle—with an open willingness to be present for it.

When we refuse the difficult parts, we also dull our capacity for joy. When we meet both with a basic “yes, this is happening,” life begins to feel more whole.

This is not forced positivity. It is simple honesty mixed with respect for the fact that we are alive.

Practice Once today, when something mildly difficult or uncomfortable arises, pause and say quietly to yourself: “This is part of my life right now.” Then continue. No need to fix or improve it in that moment—just include it.

Closing of Module 1

The living current begins here:

  • Return to the present.
  • Respect the uniqueness and shortness of your actual life.
  • Care for the body and act from inner conviction.
  • Grow happiness through real effort and honest results.
  • Meet both joy and difficulty with a basic willingness to be here.

These are not advanced techniques. They are the ground. Everything else in the path grows from this simple, repeated return to the living now.

Take a few days with these practices before moving further. Let the ordinary moments themselves teach you.

Read Full Post »

The Rebirth of Melchior Dronte by Paul Busson and translated by Joe E Bandel

Over and over again they went about to create new life.
They hid themselves from the others and became one. All
beings, which were invisible to the people, but always surround
them, retreated before the divine, which emanated from the
procreators, however barren and poor they might otherwise be,
as flawed and weak, but in this action they unleashed the
elemental power of eternity, they were more powerful and
greater than all other creatures. I was fervently attached to such
pairs of people everywhere. In the black nomad tents of the
steppes, in dim snow huts, in thin beds, on haystacks, behind
stacks of boards, in the bushes of the forest, on the straw
mattresses of dull houses, in garrets and state rooms. In
countless places, at secret hours of the day and night. The law
was above me. I felt attracted and repelled, without grief,
disappointment or impatience.
Once it happened, quicker than the lightning flared up.
At the union of two cells, the power of new life enclosed
me. I was caught in tiny union, caught up in hot, red, radiant,
working and pulsating being. I felt warmth, darkness, moisture,
currents of nourishment, the rustling of creative forces. Blissful
growth was in me.
Juices flowed through me; the thunder of unfolding and
the soft crackling of becoming were around me. Consciousness
became dim. Sleep enveloped it, happy, refreshing sleep. Torn
and incoherent experiences passed through my dreams as
unrecognizable silhouettes, disjointed and inaudible, ancient,
lost, sinking memories.
I grew in slumber, stretched my limbs out comfortably,
smacking with pleasure, stretched, moved softly in sleep.
Delicate and precious organs, protected in bony armor, were
formed in me, warm blood raced through me in rapid,
throbbing beats, friendly tightness pressed me tenderly, moved
me swaying, showing me the way to the light.
Crystal, cold, clear air rushed into my lungs.
Colorful, confused rays penetrated my eyes, confused
sounds pressed into my ears. Everything happened to me that
accompanies young life when it enters this world.
I was there. I was the one who had come back, the Ewli.
My name was Sennon Vorauf.
I had a father, a mother and other people who loved me. I
learned to speak and walk, a child like other children.
Everything was new to me, a great revelation.
Until the ability to look back into my past life.
This began with dreams of anxiety in childhood, which
caused my good parents a lot of worry. But even when I was
awake, I was not safe from sudden sinking. The memories of
Melchior Dronte, the son of a nobleman in days long past,
came back to me fiercely, and frightened me very much. Only
slowly did I gain from myself the repetitive, chasing, and
frightening memories and gradually put them together so that I
could grasp them as fragments of a former whole, which I
called the life of Melchior Dronte, my former life.
Shaken by the horror of my parents (they often both sat
by my bedside and listened, stunned by my wild fantasies, as
they thought), I withdrew already in boyhood and showed
myself to others as a strangely precocious, quiet and thoughtful
child, who preferred to sit alone staring with open eyes.
My new life was suitable for such thoughtfulness. My
parents, good-hearted and simple people, had, following a
custom of the country, named me “Sennon” after one of the two
saints of my birthday and loved me more than anything. After
ten years of childless marriage, I was the eagerly awaited “gift
from heaven” sent to them. In the first years of my life, I had,
as already mentioned often caused them great fear and worry.
Thus I had once fell into severe convulsions when, by accident,
I was present when a few boys threw stones at a black dog, so
that it ran away howling. To an aunt, who loved me tenderly, I
did not want to go to her until the squawking parrot, which she
had in her apartment was removed.
Sometimes one, such as the reader of this book,
understandably took these behaviors for stubbornness and
punished me mildly. The patience and the lack of any
consciousness of guilt, with which I accepted the gentle
punishments, however, soon made it completely impossible for
the good-hearted to act against me in such a way.
Especially my mother, who despite her low status was an
unusually sensitive Frau, who with her trained intuition,
recognized better than my father, that all the violent emotional
expressions of her child must indicate quite unusual mental
processes which ruled out any crude influence. I clearly
remember a Sunday afternoon, when I was with her in a garden
filled with the deep glow of the autumn sun. She had cut
flowers to put in a vase. The arrangement of the copper, blue,
white and fire-yellow Georgiana flowers she had made
suddenly seized me in a very peculiar way, and without being
able to explain where these words came from, I said
completely lost in a dream and quietly to myself:
“Aglaja also arranged them like this”.
Then my mother looked at me with a very strange, shy
look, stroked her hand over my hair and said to me:
“You must have once loved her very much -.”
We then spoke nothing for a long time, until it became
completely dark. Then mother heaved a sigh of relief, hugged
me fiercely and we went into the house to wait for my father,
who was working in a large optical company.
I had little contact with other children, and generally kept
away from them, not because I was arrogant or afraid of people,
but because I had no taste for their games. I still liked best to
be with the son of a well-traveled doctor who lived in our
neighborhood, with Kaspar Hedrich, who was the same age as
me, and who, like me, was a quiet and lonely boy. I went on
many hikes in the surroundings of the small town that was my
home, and to him, as the only one, I sometimes told my dreams,
but only when I was in my twelfth or thirteenth year, did the
realization dawn on me of the nature of these ever-renewing
and complementary dream images and what they were. From
then on I kept them to myself and did not listen to Kaspar’s
vehement pleas to tell him more. In any case, he was the only
one who listened with great attention and without any sign of
disbelief until then to the tangled stories that often violently
forced themselves out of me, perhaps only in the unconscious
longing to find an explanation for them. When this finally came
like a revelation, I guarded my secret in the realization that it
could hardly ever be understood correctly by others.
Then something happened with Kaspar Hedrich and me,
which at that time filled me with great uneasiness. Today,
however, I must think of the event with a smile and am filled
with consolation, of an event that was my first, dearest, greatest
and most valuable confirmation of the special pardon that I
have been granted.
Kaspar and I had a special joy of walking on cold winter
days on the frozen dead branch of the river to a place where we
could ice skate that was a half an hour’s walk away. We kept
this place of our solitary pleasures from our parents, knowing
that they would not have allowed us because of the danger of
both the remoteness of the water and the uncertainty of the ice
conditions. They thought nothing other than that we, like the
other boys, were on one of the two busy and completely safe,
artificially created skating rinks of the town. The deception
succeeded all the more, because neither of our fathers, who
were busy during the day nor my mother, who was absorbed in
the economic worries of the day (Kaspar’s mother had been
dead for a long time), had ever found time to teach us skating
skills.
On the day I want to tell you about, Kaspar came to us
with the skates on his arm to pick me up. There was a warm
wind that had sprung up, and water dripped softly from the roof.
All the more reason, thought my playmate, to hurry in order to
take advantage of the last opportunity of the departing winter.
However, I had caught a cold the day before and was
feverish. My worried mother, who came into the room during
the visit, explained that in view of my condition Kaspar would
have to do without my company this time. I was always
obedient to my mother and complied. Kaspar was disappointed
to have to do without his comrade, but then he said goodbye
and went on his usual way to the lonely river place alone.
After about an hour, my mother took a pillow and
lovingly made me sit on the bench by the warm stove and lean
against the cushion. She herself did some work and advised me
to take a little nap, and I soon heard her knitting softly rattling
half in a dream. All of a sudden it was as if I could clearly hear
the voice of my friend, who repeatedly and in the highest fear
called my first name!
I wanted to rise, but I was paralyzed. I made a
tremendous effort. Then it happened.
Suddenly I found myself outside my body. I clearly saw
myself, sitting on the stove bench with stiff, wide-open eyes,
with my unsuspecting mother at the table, lost in her counting
meshes at the table. In the very next moment I found myself, as
if carried away by a whizzing gust of wind, at the edge of that
river arm. With the greatest sharpness I saw the leafless pollard
willows, the uniform gray of the ice, the snow eaten away by
the warm wind, the skate tracks on the slippery ice and in the
middle of the cracked ice an open spot of the water, from
which, screaming in fear, Kaspar’s head protruded, and his
wildly beating hands that searched in vain for a hold on the
breaking ice sheets.
Without any reflection I stepped across the ice to the very
edge of the collapse, reached out my hand to the man in the
greatest need and pulled him without the slightest effort onto
the solid ice. He saw me, chattering with his teeth from the
frost, and yet laughing with joy, and opened his mouth to say
something —.
Then something pulled me away from him with terrible
force and I was seized by an unparalleled feeling of fear, and I
became painfully aware of my own distressed body —

Read Full Post »

The Rebirth of Melchior Dronte by Paul Busson and translated by Joe E Bandel

I went near one of the windows, unfolded the paper and
read:
“My heart weeps for the best and noblest of men; yet I
bow before a heroism that respects death less than the betrayal
of itself. My now impotent gratitude will forever honor your
memory. May there be a reunion that gives you new goals.”
It was the well-known handwriting of the magister.
In the dim morning light we could see through the
windows, which were high up but clean and bright, that a fine
rain was falling outside. Drops hung sparkling on the iron bars
of the lattice.
This dungeon, admittedly the last one in which we were
housed, was in every respect friendlier than the gloomy coal
mine where we had awaited our sentencing. A bow-legged
jailer with a good-natured face and a natural gift for joking
words, brought us washing water in wooden cans and lent us
clean, coarse cloths to dry our faces and hands. For those
prisoners who still had money on them, he provided chocolate
for breakfast and pieces of cake. The others were given a soup
of burnt rye flour and a large slice of bread.
Since everything seemed trivial to me that was still
connected with the needs of the body, I was content with a few
spoonfuls of soup. Also in these last hours of my life, I
sometimes felt as if I were completely outside the events and
saw from afar, like an observer, me and my fellow sufferers.
Nevertheless, this observing being, which was my ego, was
connected by a guiding thread with my body, and felt the
morning chill, hunger and that dull, constricting feeling in the
stomach area, which precedes bad events. This strange out-of-
myself sensation was so strong that my own hands seemed like
something foreign, for I looked at them closely and with a
strange feeling as if I were seeing something familiar again
after a long time. In all these ambivalent feelings was mixed
with a kind of regret over the ingratitude, with which the soul
calmly left forever, the house in which it had been for so long
and through whose senses it had taken in the image of its
changing surroundings. I could not, try as I might, find
anything great or decisive in the imminent departure from the
accustomed form of earthly life. It was as if the body, although
its sensations continued, no longer participated in those of the
soul.
Even the scenes that took place around me could not
move me violently, as much as I was aware of their sadness.
Something constantly stirred in me, as if I had to speak to the
poor people and tell them that all this was only of secondary
importance and that it did not really have to mean much. But it
was also completely clear to me that they would not have
understood me at all, and so I kept silent and out of the way.
Many things happened around me. Women wept bitterly
and their hot tears, with which they said goodbye to life,
dripped into the soup bowls from which they ate. The Marquis
de Carmignac sat in a corner and had his beard shaved and his
hair arranged. A withered, weary smiling old man read to a
small crowd of listeners from the “Consolations of Philosophy”
by Boethius. A handsome young man in a riding suit leaned
against a pillar with rapt eyes and hummed a little song over
and over again, which was obviously dear to him as a memory.
He stopped only when an Abbe, who was whispering prayers
with several older and younger ladies, approached him and
politely asked him not to disturb the religious gathering of the
dying. Several sat dully, despairingly and completely absorbed
in themselves on the straw mattresses of the beds that were set
up here.
After some time, a young, pale-looking barber’s assistant
entered with the jailer, waved to his comrade, who was taking
the marquis’ tip with many bows and with a trembling voice
asked the people present to sit down in turn on a bench placed
in the middle of the room, to have their hair cut. This request
caused loud sobs and a fit of fainting, but the toilet, as the
procedure was called for short, proceeded swiftly. The long
tresses of the ladies, which were carefully cut off and placed in
a small basket, he very politely requested them to be
considered useful for his business, and presented each woman
who gave her consent, a small vial of smelling salts as a return
gift.
The frosty, rattling and moving of the scissor also
touched my neck, and their blades cut through my hair. Coldly
I felt the lack.
All around, the praying grew louder and more fervent. At
eight o’clock a booming drum rattled and the door opened. In
front of a crowd of soldiers, a commissar with a sash appeared
and read off name after name from a list. All those named rose
immediately and lined up to the left of the door.
“Citizen Melchior Dronte!”
I bowed briefly to those who obviously remained behind,
and stood next to a tall, strong man who, with a contemptuous
expression, derisively pushed his chin forward. By his braids
and lapels and the uniform, I recognized him as a major of the
Broglie regiment.
“Skunks – riffraff from the gutter!” he growled and spat
out so violently that a small, hungry-looking soldier jumped to
the side, startled.
A somewhat lopsided, gray-clad man with a mocking
face, who was one of those called up, laughed softly to himself.
“This carnival play will soon be over. And it wasn’t even
very funny.”
We were now; about twenty in number, led out of the
cellar, went up the stairs and came to a courtyard that was
completely surrounded by soldiers. It was still trickling thinly
from the cloudy sky. Some ladder wagons were standing there,
and we were ordered to sit on the boards nailed across. A boy
of about fifteen years old climbed up behind us and tied our
hands behind our backs with strong vine cords, supervised by a
mounted sergeant. I saw that the young lad whispered
something in the ear of each person whom he bound. And when
it came to my turn, I heard from behind, half-breathed, while
the warm breath hit my shivering neck, the words:
“Forgive me!”
I felt how restless and hot the hands were that bound my
arms.
Amidst much shouting, running to and fro, and up and
down trotting of the cavalry escort the wagons were finally
loaded with their human cargo. Next to the coachman, a soldier
swung himself onto the bench and the big door of the courtyard
opened with a loud creak. Incalculable masses of people filled
the street outside and formed two rows, between which our
carts now slowly began to roll.
Quietly, I looked around me. In front of me, stiffly erect
and looking over the people, sat the Marquis de Carmignac,
next to him the major of the Broglie regiment, who, with his
furiously lowered red head reminded of an irritated bull.
Crouched on the bench next to me was an obviously deranged
man, about sixty years old, with white beard stubble, a
wrinkled face and rolling eyes, who was intoning incessant
incantations to himself.
“O Astaroth, O Typhon, O ye seven fiery dragons, you, O
keeper of the seals, hasten to help me! Let flames fall upon
them, let the earth open up and take them to the lowest hell, but
carry me to the garden of the white Ariel Arizoth Araman
Arihel Adonai.”
The words became unintelligible, and at last he burst into
a triumphant giggle and became calm, obviously firmly
convinced of the sure effect of his spirit invocation.
I turned my head with difficulty to the back bench and
caught sight of an aging girl with brick-red spots on her
cheekbones, who was dressed in a black robe, with her eyes
turned to Heaven, praying without ceasing. Beside this nun,
who with glowing eyes, was preparing for martyrdom,
trembled like a jelly, a white-flour covered baker, whose
swollen, puffy eyes gazed out of a hot face in which mortal fear
gaped. His huge belly, which almost burst the buttons of the
trousers, wobbled back and forth with every step of the horses.
I saw excessively clearly, and not the slightest detail
escaped me. I noticed a hanging silver button on the jacket of
the marquis. On the neck of the major an inflamed pustule. On
the vest of the man sitting next to me the remains of an egg
dish, and the medals on the nun’s rosary sometimes clinked
against a board of the cart.
My poor body, which was now to change, was doing
everything in its power to keep the calm serenity of the spirit
that was preparing to leave busy with unimportant worries on
its way into eternity. A natural need, for the satisfaction of
which there was no time left to satisfy, arose with annoying
agony. An old cold pain which had not tormented me for a long
time, had shot into my right hip during the night and caused me
great agony with the shocks of the cart. And to all this was
added the fear of death that the body felt. It manifested itself in
strong stomach pains and finally brought it to the point that
cold drops ran down my face. It was cold sweat, death sweat…
But I stood above or beside these sensations which, in
spite of their strength, could no longer really penetrate to the
consciousness. A sharp and irrevocable divorce between body
and soul had occurred, and the soul realized with joy that no
earthly feeling would accompany it on its way.
From the crowd a song burst forth in full chords, into
which thousands of voices fell. The truly entrancing melody,
the words of which I could not understand, except for
“Fatherland”, “tyranny” and the like, had a strong and moving
effect on me. It was a genuine and noble-born, fiery child of
the time, and it was as if this rapturous singing carried
something hot in it.
Everywhere people were looking out of the windows of
the suburban houses, joining in the song with bright,
enthusiastic voices and waving their scarves. The horses in
front of our wagon, a chestnut and a summer black, neighed
and began to prance and nod their heads in time with the
mighty tune, which was glowing and storming up to the sky.
Even the driver, a scowling man, and the young soldier next to
him sang the hymn, for such it was, with a loud voice.

Read Full Post »

The Rebirth of Melchior Dronte by Paul Busson and translated by Joe E Bandel

Only when complete silence had fallen in the background
he leaned back in his armchair, so that the blue-white-red sash
wrapped around his body tightened, took a sheet of paper from
the table, as if playing, and said with a singing and theatrical
voice:
“Citizen Anastasia Beaujonin!”
Loud murmuring, throat clearing and spitting out behind
us betrayed the now beginning tension of the audience.
The young woman next to me had let out a small scream
at the mention of her name. She stood up, burst into a new
torrent of tears and pressed a tiny handkerchief to her eyes. I
looked at her pityingly. Her pretty dress, pink and blue
flowered, was badly wrinkled and disfigured. Several times she
ran with her hand, smoothing out the wrinkles. Surely the
appearance of her person preoccupied her just as much as the
concern about the outcome of a trial that knew neither
witnesses nor in its deliberate brevity offered little hope.
The chairman assumed a significant posture, made a
beautiful gesture with his right hand, and spoke with an
emphasis as if he wanted to declaim:
“Pay attention to what I say, Citizen Beaujonin! Think
about your answers, because our time is short. It does not
belong to us, but to the nation. You are accused of keeping
Baron Hautecorne hidden in the attic of your house for three
days although you must have known that he belonged among
the proscribed. What do you have to reply?”
“Oh, my God,” the woman stammered. “I loved him so
much — -“
The judge smiled. From behind one heard a coarse
woman’s voice:
“She is brave, the little one, and speaks as a woman
should speak.”
“Silence, Mother Flanche!” shouted the judge. “You must
not make any remarks here!”
“Don’t break anything, my sweet boy!” it came back. “I
have known you since you were a Temple singer.”
The chairman was about to start up, but then only made a
dismissive gesture with his hand and said, turning to the young
woman, “So?”
She swallowed a few times and directed her shy, fearful
gaze on me for a moment, as if she were trying to get courage
from me. This seemed to annoy the judge, because he took a
petition and knocked violently on the table with it.
“And why did you love citizen Hautecorne so much?” he
asked mockingly, showing his white teeth.
“Because he was so beautiful-almost as beautiful as
you!” She said softly, looking at him with a full gaze.
A storm of applause, mixed with shouts, laughter and the
trampling of feet roared through the hall.
Even the committee members smiled sourly, and the
chairman stroked back a curl of hair that had fallen across his
forehead with a smug movement.
“Let the little girl go – -,” cried one.
“She needs her head to give it to you-,” they laughed.
“Well said, Rodolphe.”
“She knows how you men must be treated.”
When silence had returned, the Judge said in a gentle
voice:
“Madame, I have reason to believe that you were
unaware of the danger of this enemy of the Republic when
your assistance was rendered?”
“Oh – no,” sobbed the accused, quickly grasping her
advantage. “I love the Republic -. I would have never –“
“Did he at least do his thing well, your baron?” roared
one of the audience.
The judge struck the butt of the file angrily.
“Hey, now, Perrin, Verrou, and Mastiche, see who’s
trying to make my acquaintance back there!” he shouted, and at
once three soldiers stumbled into the background, their heavy
rifles in their arms.
Immediately there was silence.
The judge leaned toward the committee members. They
whispered and nodded to him.
“Madame,” then said the presiding judge, “I will dare to
set you at liberty for the time being. But take care!”
“Oh -” the woman cried out and laughed all over her face.
“Wait Madame. I want to take it upon myself. I have a
responsibility to answer to the nation. You see, the people are
mild and chivalrous to women, if that is possible. Before you
leave you will have the goodness to write your future address
on a piece of paper and hand it to me!”
“Oh, you damned truffle pig,” laughed one of them. The
soldiers spoke fiercely at him.
“I’ll say no more,” he assured them. “Let go of my
paws!”
Silence fell again.
The little girl smiled gracefully, pattered on her high
heels to the tribune table and scribbled a few words on a piece
of paper, which the judge held out to her, read and pocketed.
Suppressed laughter in the auditorium accompanied this action.
“You may go, Madame, but you will remain at the
Tribunal’s disposal!”
The woman stopped, looked sheepishly and uncertainly
at the judges and then at the laughing spectators, turned
suddenly and ran quickly, looking neither to the right nor to the
left, right through the middle of the dumbfounded looking
soldiers and out of the room.
Immediately, the chairman assumed a dreadful official
face, rustled with paper and then said briefly and sharply:
“Citizen Melchior Dronte!”
I stood up.
Everything in me was calm, all fear disappeared. Again, I
felt as if I were now contemplating a fate, whose further
development was completely clear to me. Without any hostility
I looked at the vain man who had set himself as a judge over
me. His gaze immediately met mine and passed me by. In order
to hide this weakness, he took his eyes off me and taking some
sheets from the table acted as if he needed a constant insight
into the act, which would explain the circumstances of my
capture and the charges against me.
At last he raised his head and said:
“In the case of an expression of the will of the people,
which was directed against the rightfully detested citizen
Lamballe —“
A many-voiced outburst of rage arose.
“Death to the aristocrat! Down with her!”
“Shut your mouths!”
“She’s already perished!”
“Death to Lamballe!”
The judge waited patiently for the noise to subside, and
then continued:
“- The detested citizen Lamballe, from whom important
information about a conspiracy in England against the republic
were to be hoped for, has been crushed by the holy wrath of the
citizens. You, citizen Dronte, have made the attempt to obstruct
the people, who were passing and carrying out its judgment.
What were your intentions with the way you handled this?”

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »