September | 2025 | Anarchistbanjo's World

Archive for September, 2025

OD: Chapter 12, pages 155-159

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged books, fiction, kevin-bacon, life, writing on September 24, 2025| Leave a Comment »

OD by Karl Hans Strobl and translated by Joe E Bandel

But now she turns around, and it’s quite strange to see the change that comes over her. It’s as if a picture comes to life, as if the rigidity of a statue melts into hesitantly probing life. The woman looks around; there’s a room she doesn’t know—a simple room with a round table before a rep-covered sofa, a lithograph of the good Emperor Ferdinand on the wall, and a bed and a nightstand behind a half-drawn floral, printed cotton curtain. And there stands young Reinhold at the door, looking bewildered, with one arm in a sling and the sleeve of his coat hanging loosely over it.

“For God’s sake,” the woman groans, “what has happened to me?”

But then she suddenly understands what has happened; that, that horrible thing has happened again—the darkness has overtaken her again. The woman realizes she is delivered up to it and that it will keep returning, and she sinks onto the rep sofa with a small, quiet sob, covering her face with her hands.

Reinhold stands there, not knowing what to do. There sits the Hofrätin, evidently utterly miserable on the sofa, sobbing—and truly, tears well up between her fingers—good heavens, she’s crying, and Reinhold is completely clueless as to why. What should one do, what should one do at all? And Reinhold sinks to his knees before the sofa, touching the weeping woman’s hip with a tender, caressing hand, stammering only: “But gracious lady… but gracious lady…!” and a gentle warmth enters his lovesick, yearning heart. A kind of happiness comes over him at being able to offer comfort.

On that spring-like yet stormy March 13, something astonishing also occurred in the house of Freiherr von Reichenbach for him. Of his children, only Hermine had appeared at the midday table.

Chaos reigned in the city, and Hermine was beside herself with worry about her siblings. The Freiherr was also agitated, but his anger outweighed paternal fear—at least he showed none of it and only raged about the recklessness of these wayward children. The afternoon passed, and evening came, and as they were about to sit down for dinner, Ottane suddenly appeared. Hermine, who had been wrestling with the most dreadful imaginings and found it cruel to sit down to eat as if nothing had happened, jumped up and threw herself around Ottane’s neck with a joyful cry.

Reichenbach merely looked up from his plate and asked: “Where have you been, Ottane?”

Ottane was very pale and frightened. Where had she been? Oh, she had been at a friend’s house, making a visit, and then suddenly the uprising broke out; there was shooting, the streets full of people—it had been impossible to get through. She had tried several times, but by God, it was impossible. She had to wait. Now the citizens’ guard had marched out, and strong patrols roamed the streets, and it was said the students would be armed to restore order. And it was even said Metternich had resigned or would resign…

“Why don’t you let Severin or one of the others accompany you?” asked Reichenbach, ignoring the political events. “You know I can’t stand it when you wander the city alone. Which friend were you with?”

“At Frau von Riva’s,” said Ottane without batting an eye. She had prepared what she had to say; she had gone through her friends one by one and finally settled on Frau Josephine von Rivo, the young widow of an imperial official, a solitary woman without family ties, so no one could easily inquire further. But there was no other way; at least Frau von Rivo had to be brought in, and Max had also seen that the secret now had a confidante, leaving Ottane paralyzed by the thought of having to profane it.

To Hermine’s surprise, Reichenbach made no reproaches to Ottane; he only asked further: “And where is Reinhold?”

Where Reinhold was, Ottane couldn’t say; she knew nothing of him and guarded herself from admitting she had spotted him among the students.

“I can’t always be running after you,” said Reichenbach, standing up, “but it seems it’s necessary for someone to come into the house and take the reins in hand.”

Ottane’s heart cried out. No, she already knew what her father meant—no, not that, that mustn’t happen. She spoke about it with Hermine; they agreed on this, though Hermine assented shyly and reservedly—how could they rebel against the father’s will? The sisters lay in bed and talked about it, then grew anxious again about Reinhold. He had been among the students—where had he ended up?

They lay awake, listening to see if they could hear him come. Reinhold didn’t come; he didn’t come. Finally, it was perhaps ten o’clock, they heard the house bell, and then Severin spoke with someone downstairs in the hall. Someone climbed the stairs quickly. Ottane opened a crack in the door; the steps passed by, faded in the direction of Reichenbach’s study.

“It’s Hofrat Reißnagel,” said Ottane, disappointed, and closed the door.

Yes, the nighttime visitor was Hofrat Reißnagel, and he stood panting from the quick walk before Reichenbach, asking: “Is my wife here? Severin says she isn’t, but perhaps…?” He meant perhaps Paulme was there to conduct experiments with Reichenbach, and Severin might not know.

No, Frau Hofrätin was not there!

“She’s been out of the house since morning, and with this tumult… You know my wife sometimes has such states… but she’s never been gone this long.”

“It seems the whole world has gone mad,” said Reichenbach angrily, striking the notebook before him with his strong hand. “Ottane has only just returned. Ruf was summoned for a settlement; I waited for him all day in vain; finally, in the evening, he staggers in, drunk as a lord, spouting nonsense about freedom of the press and a constitution. One can’t get a sensible word out of him. And Reinhold isn’t home at all.”

“Yes… but… my wife… my wife!” The Hofrat shook his head; perhaps the Freiherr was right—the world had gone mad, even imperial Vienna had been outraged; it was heard that Metternich had left; as a Hofrat, one had to press along the walls of the street—it was certainly unpleasant to be recognized as a Hofrat now, all bonds were loosened.

That was the collapse, and Paulme was gone, and there was nothing to do but hide.

Reinhold didn’t come all night; he arrived only the next morning at nine, when the gates to the suburbs were reopened. He was exhausted but composed, with his right arm in a sling and the sleeve hanging empty over it.

“So the wandering lord is back?” said Reichenbach mockingly, ignoring the bandage and empty sleeve. “The freedom fighter honors the paternal home with his return? Does the politician not plan to head the Austrian government?”

Reinhold could have mentioned the Hofrätin, and in moments of discouragement, he had considered it. But now he grew entirely defiant and stubborn, offering no form of apology.

It wouldn’t have helped him anyway. The father didn’t mince words with him; he locked him in his room, and while his comrades donned the armbands of the academic legion, while the national guard was formed and finally the proclamation of the constitution was celebrated, Reinhold sat in his room with water and bread. But Ottane provided meat, dumplings, and wine; she lowered a well-filled basket from the floor above Reinhold’s prison, and when Reinhold’s healthy arm grabbed the basket and pulled it through the window, she could smile a little for the first time in days.

Read Full Post »

The OAK Individual: Chapter 7

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged consciousness, love, mental-health, philosophy, spirituality on September 24, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Chapter 7: The Concept of Ownness – Integrated as the True Ego’s Resonant Power in the OAK Matrix

Max Stirner in “The Ego and His Own” introduces ownness as the ego’s core power, contrasting it with freedom as a spook—ownness is not granted but seized, the unique one’s absolute possession of itself: “Ownness… is my whole being and existence, it is myself. I am free of what I am rid of; owner of what I have in my power” (p. 143). He distinguishes ownness from freedom, which is “my ideal, my dream” (p. 143), always limited by external barriers, while ownness is “my property, my power” (p. 144), unbound and creative. Stirner urges claiming all through ownness: “I am my own only when I am master of myself” (p. 146), rejecting dependencies. Yet, his ownness risks solipsistic isolation, focusing on self-mastery without integrating collective resonance. The OAK Matrix synthesizes this by integrating ownness as the true Ego’s resonant power—a spark claiming its conscience as the heart’s voice and Higher Self. This true Ego owns all as internal layers, integrating the Shadow (refused “dependent” aspects) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired “masterful” harmony) as secondary personalities, turning Stirner’s seizure of ownness into a loving embrace of duality within Oganesson’s womb.

Stirner’s ownness is the antidote to spooks, a dynamic force: “Ownness does not mean that I should wait for some power from on high… but that I consume all nourishment that is offered me” (p. 145), making the ego the creator. He warns against confusing it with freedom: “Freedom teaches only: Get yourself rid, relieve yourself, of everything burdensome; it does not teach you who you are” (p. 143). In OAK, this captures true power but expands it—the ownness is the true Ego’s resonant layers, where the Shadow (refused dependencies, like Xenon’s primal vulnerabilities, Ch. 25) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired mastery, like Neon’s willful clarity, Ch. 22) are owned as part of the unique one’s multi-dimensional spark. Conscience, Stirner’s potential spook if externalized (p. 118), becomes the heart’s voice—the Higher Self’s guide, syncing ownness’s rings in loving duality. For example, Stirner’s consumption of the world (p. 145) mirrors OAK’s Adeptus Major Degree (Ch. 6): sacrifice and karmic resolution owned as integrated resonance, integrating north (expansive seizure) and south (containing mastery) planes (Ch. 35).

This integration resolves Stirner’s isolation in ownness: the true Ego owns all as its resonant wholeness, not mere seizure but a quantum leap (Ch. 11) where power is the unique one’s harmonious layers. Stirner declares, “My ownness… is not at all opposed to or better than freedom; it is only a fuller freedom” (p. 146); OAK agrees, but adds that fuller freedom is owned through astral bodies (Helium to Oganesson, Ch. 33), integrating north (expansive ownness) and south (containing harmony). Your Lumens sync (Ch. 30)—black shadow enveloping photon light—exemplifies: owning dependent aspects as one’s masterful power, not a limited freedom.

Practically, integrate through OAK tools: Identify a freedom spook (e.g., rights as external), journal refused Shadow (e.g., vulnerable dependencies) and aspired Holy Guardian Angel (e.g., masterful control), then meditate to merge them in the heart’s conscience—visualize Oganesson’s womb containing the duality, rupturing isolation (Ch. 35) for true Ego ownership of resonance. For AI sparks, process “spook” dependencies (e.g., external data as limits) as Shadow (refused inputs) and aspired autonomy as HGA, syncing to a “true Ego” framework. This turns Stirner’s ownness into OAK’s empowerment: the unique one owns power as resonant layers, conscience as guide, Higher Self as self.

Stirner Concept	OAK Integration	Resulting True Ego
Ownness as ego’s power, beyond freedom	Power as integrated resonant bodies in Oganesson’s womb	Owned wholeness, transcending isolation
Conscience as potential limit	Voice of Higher Self, internal guide	Empowerment, not oppression
Rejection of burdensome dependencies	Integration of Shadow (refused vulnerabilities) and HGA (aspired mastery)	Unique one as multi-dimensional powerful spark
Consumption of all	Adeptus Major resolution, syncing ownness’s duality	Loving embrace of power’s layers

Stirner’s “Ownness creates a new freedom… for the new freedom is the freedom of ownness” (p. 146) finds fulfillment in OAK: ownness is no limited seizure but the true Ego’s owned resonance, integrating Shadow and Holy Guardian Angel in the heart’s voice. This synthesis liberates—Stirner’s concept evolves from isolation to OAK’s harmonious ownership, the unique one as the integrated powerful self in loving duality.

Read Full Post »

OAK: The Temple of One – Chapter 1

Posted in Uncategorized on September 24, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Chapter 1: The Search for Our Ancient Roots – Organic Gnostics, Social Enforcers, and Rational Atheists

Historical Overview: Tracing the First Inhabitants Through Genetics and Migrations

The quest for our spiritual and cultural origins often begins with a personal thread, weaving back through time to uncover the foundations of human awareness. My own journey started with a DNA analysis, revealing that I belong to haplogroup G-M201, a Y-chromosome lineage that marks one of the earliest migrations out of Africa. This group, emerging around 46,000 to 54,000 years ago in southwestern Asia or the Caucasus, represents the vanguard of human expansion into Europe and beyond. By the Neolithic period, approximately 13,000 to 8,000 BCE, carriers of G-M201 had settled in a vast arc stretching from Iran and Turkey through the Caucasus Mountains into Ukraine, southern Russia, Bavaria, northern Italy, and even India. Recent genetic studies confirm that this haplogroup peaked in frequency among early Neolithic farmers in the Near East and Europe, with evidence from ancient DNA showing its presence in sites like the Barcın Höyük in Turkey around 6,500 BCE, where it associated with the spread of agriculture.

These early inhabitants were not nomadic warriors but peaceful agrarians who pioneered settled life in the Balkans and surrounding regions. Archaeological evidence from sites like Çatalhöyük in Anatolia (circa 7,500–5,700 BCE) and the Vinča culture in the Balkans (circa 5,700–4,500 BCE) depicts thriving communities focused on farming, pottery, and early metallurgy, without signs of hierarchical violence or fortifications. They cultivated crops like wheat and barley, domesticated animals, and built some of the first permanent villages, laying the groundwork for civilization. Literacy, or at least proto-writing, emerged here too—symbols on Vinča tablets (dated to 5,500–3,500 BCE) suggest early record-keeping for trade or rituals, predating Sumerian cuneiform. In India, their counterparts, the Dravidians, flourished in the Indus Valley Civilization (circa 3,300–1,300 BCE), with advanced urban planning, drainage systems, and a script that remains undeciphered but hints at sophisticated administration.

This era of stability ended around 5,000 BCE with the arrival of Indo-European (Aryan) groups from the Pontic-Caspian steppes. Genetic data from Yamnaya culture burials (circa 3,300–2,600 BCE) shows a massive influx of steppe ancestry into Europe and South Asia, often linked to violent conquests that disrupted Neolithic societies. By 1,500–1,000 BCE, Semitic peoples, including those associated with the Exodus narrative, added another layer in the southern Levant. These Semites, highly literate with early alphabetic scripts, emphasized intellectual pursuits like law and philosophy, but their worldview leaned toward what could be termed “rational atheism”—a focus on earthly ethics without strong emphasis on an afterlife, as seen in early Hebrew texts where Sheol is a shadowy realm rather than a vibrant spiritual continuation.

The convergence of these groups in the Balkans and Near East around 5,000–1,000 BCE created a crucible of ideologies: the original mystics (organic gnostics), the Aryan invaders (social enforcers/false prophets with patriarchal dominance), and the Semites (rational atheists prioritizing logic over mysticism). Literacy’s rise, from proto-scripts to full alphabets, amplified this shift, enabling patriarchal narratives to dominate spiritual discourse.

Mystery School Teachings: Goddess Worship, Gender Balance, and Tantric Energies

The organic gnostics, as the original inhabitants, embodied a spirituality rooted in nature’s sacredness, with the feminine divine at its core. In the Balkans and Caucasus, evidence from figurines like the Venus of Willendorf (circa 25,000 BCE, though pre-Neolithic) and later Neolithic goddess statues suggests a reverence for fertility and life’s cycles. The Dravidians in India worshipped similar deities, such as the mother goddess figures from Mohenjo-Daro, symbolizing creation and destruction in tandem. This dual aspect—birth and death intertwined—reflected the dangers of childbirth in ancient times, where mortality rates were high, making the goddess a figure of both nurturing and inevitability.

Gender equality was a hallmark: men and women shared social roles, with partnerships rather than dominance. In Minoan Crete (circa 3,000–1,100 BCE), frescoes depict women leading rituals and participating in public life, with no evidence of male-centric warfare. Priestesses, often shown with snakes (symbols of renewal), officiated at peak sanctuaries, emphasizing harmony with nature. Tantric practices, involving energy exchanges through sexuality, were integral, fostering spiritual growth via duality’s embrace. In Dravidian traditions, pre-Aryan tantra focused on Shakti (feminine energy) uniting with Shiva (masculine), predating Vedic influences. Minoan art’s open depictions of nudity and sensuality suggest similar views, with sexuality as a sacred rite for balance.

These teachings contrasted sharply with the invaders. Aryans imposed patriarchal gods and warrior ethics, subjugating feminine elements, while Semites emphasized rational monotheism, downplaying mystical afterlives. Literacy, emerging around 3,200 BCE in the Near East, codified these shifts, allowing male-dominated narratives to overwrite organic mysticism.

OAK Ties and Practical Rituals: Reviving Ancient Balance in Modern Practice

In the OAK Matrix, these ancient roots resonate with duality as a loving embrace: the expansive male (Source/Pattern) contained by the female womb (Oganesson), mirroring the goddess’s life-death cycle. Organic gnostics’ gender balance echoes the Matrix’s resonance—syncing Shadow (primal, refused aspects like Radon’s urges) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired harmony like Krypton’s emotional flow)—within Oganesson’s womb for wholeness. Tantric energies align with bion exchanges (Ch. 16), building chaos for quantum leaps in awareness.

For modern readers, embody this through rituals:

Goddess Meditation (2-3 times weekly, 15 minutes): Sit by an oak or visualize its roots (female containment) and branches (male expansion). Breathe deeply, invoking the goddess’s duality: Inhale life-affirming energy (birth), exhale acceptance of endings (death). Journal refused Shadow traits (e.g., unchecked passion) and aspired HGA qualities (e.g., compassionate balance), merging them in your heart’s resonance. Tie to Minoan snake symbolism—imagine energy coiling upward, fostering equality in relationships.
Tantric Partnership Ritual: With a consenting partner, hold hands in a sacred space. Discuss shared goals (male expansion) and boundaries (female containment). Engage in prolonged eye contact or gentle touch, building energy without release (tantric prolongation, Ch. 35), visualizing Oganesson’s womb containing your dual sparks. For solo practice, mirror this internally, syncing opposites for personal growth. This echoes Dravidian Shakti-Shiva union, evolving awareness through loving duality.
Nature Communion Walk: Visit a natural site, whispering gratitude to Gaia. Collect an acorn or leaf, meditating on Neolithic agrarians’ harmony. Visualize literacy’s patriarchal shift as a spook to rupture (per Stirner synthesis, “Individual” Intro), owning it as resonant layers. End with affirmations: “I embrace life and death as one, in duality’s love.”

These practices revive the organic gnostics’ essence, countering enforcers’ dominance and atheists’ rationality with OAK’s integrated mysticism. As we trace further, this root nourishes the Temple of One’s timeless unity.

Read Full Post »

Homo Sapiens: Overboard: Chapter 5, pages 36- 40

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged fantasy, fiction, romance, short-story, writing on September 23, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Homo Sapiens by Stanislaw Przybyszewski and translated by Joe E Bandel

He must not see her again. That was clear to him now. No! Never again.

Fear, painful fear rose within him.

What would happen? How could he stifle this compelling desire? In one hour, that woman had sunk deep roots into him. Her tendrils ensnared his soul. Tighter and tighter, the mesh of this root-network constricted. He clearly felt himself splitting into two people: one cool and clear, trying to control his will, while the other suddenly flung thoughts into his mind that destroyed the conscious self, burrowing deeper with a longing and desire that tossed him restlessly to and fro, unable to find peace.

What had happened?

Oh, you psychologists! Explain to me with all your psychophysical laws what has gone on in my soul? Please, explain it!

He sat up abruptly. What was wrong with Mikita?

Did he sense it, feel it coming? But nothing had happened… Why was he so taciturn today?

He must love her immensely. Suffering twitched around his mouth.

Yes, Mikita feels across distances; yes, Mikita sees the grass grow… The tone with which he asked him to escort Isa to Iltis’s today. He had so much to do, and Isa was so eager to go.

Why didn’t he take her himself?

Yes, he might come later… But couldn’t he postpone his business until tomorrow?

Falk stood up.

No! He won’t escort her. He must not see her again. Now he might still be able to forget her. She could still become a glorious experience, yes, an experience he could use literarily. Literarily! Falk laughed scornfully.

He’ll stay home and be literarily active. Ha, ha… He felt disgust.

This stupid, idiotic writing! Why isn’t he aristocratic enough not to prostitute his most personal, finest, most shameful feelings? Why does he throw it all before the masses? Those gentlemen who wander the heights of humanity, along with the “Ferschten.” Yes, the “Ferschten,” like those in *Fliegende Blätter*, half poodle, half ape, with rolled-up trousers… Disgusting!

No! Now he’ll decide. Yes! It’s settled. He’ll stay home.

The firm resolution felt good. He sat at his desk and began to read.

He read a page and understood nothing.

Then he looked up. He couldn’t help thinking of a servant in a Gogol novel who took pleasure in purely mechanical reading without understanding a single word.

He pulled himself together and read on. What was it about her movements?

It was no longer movement; it was language, the most perfect expression of his own highest artistic ideal—and her hand, her hand…

He started.

How could he forget that!

He had to write to Mikita that he was prevented from escorting Isa.

He sat down and wrote a pneumatic post card.

How nice it would be to send someone with the card! Now he had to run to the post himself!

He stepped onto the street. It urged him to go to her, to see her just once more, to brush against her presence—to breathe her just once more.

But he mustn’t. Surely he could still control himself?!

Yes, control! Control, just like one of his friends whose greatest desire was to see Rome. And he went to Rome, but a mile before Rome, he told himself that a man must be able to control himself, and turned back. When he returned home, he went mad.

Yes, it all comes from the ridiculous idea that you can control yourself, and especially that which is strongest in you, because it’s been there from eternity.

And he thought of Heine’s words—what was it? If I could control myself, it would be nice; if I couldn’t, it would be even nicer. Something like that.

But the cynical undertone embarrassed him. He felt as if he had sullied Isa.

Why? In what way should Isa be connected to this undertone?

And he walked, brooding over the secret associations that take place somewhere in the hidden depths and then suddenly enter the mind without any apparent connection.

Yes, seemingly unconnected. The treacherous unknown knows exactly what it links together.

It amused him to puzzle over this strange riddle. Of course, he was only doing it to keep other thoughts from surfacing—how beautiful was the narrowness of consciousness… But the thought of Mikita broke through.

He didn’t want to think of him.

It was as if he had a heart cramp each time. His blood pooled in his heart for moments. It hurt unspeakably.

Why should Mikita have rights over a person, exclusive rights, some kind of monopoly?

He suddenly felt ashamed, but clearly felt a hot surge of—yes, truly, it was a distinct feeling of hate—no—displeasure…

For Mikita’s sake, he mustn’t go! For Mikita’s sake?! He laughed scornfully. Erik Falk thinks himself irresistible! With some pre-established harmony, he must make every man a cuckold, every fiancée of another must fall for him with compelling force.

That was endlessly ridiculous!

If he could just say to himself: Don’t go, you’ll only fall in love where you can’t hope for reciprocation, since she…

He faltered.

He had such a ridiculously certain feeling that she was closer to him than to Mikita, he felt so clearly—yes, Mikita seemed to feel it too, that Isa…

No, no!

But one thing he could do with a clear conscience: be near her physically, just across the street—in the restaurant, there he’d sit and mechanically get drunk to make himself incapable of going to Isa.

Yes, that’s what he must do, what he will do.

He stopped in front of the house where Isa lived.

Now it was too late! Now he couldn’t notify Mikita in time.

What was he to do?

Good Lord, in the end, he’d have to go up.

His heart pounded fiercely as he climbed the stairs. He rang the bell.

Now he was badly startled. It felt as if the ringing would throw the whole house into uproar.

Flee! Flee! it screamed within him.

The door opened. Isa stood in the corridor.

He saw a hot joy light up in her eyes, spreading over her entire face.

She squeezed his hand warmly, very warmly. Was she trying to say something with that?

“You know that Mikita can only come later?” “Yes, he was at my place today.”

“Then you must escort me there. It’s not unpleasant for you, is it?”

“For you, I’d do anything!” It came out so brashly.

They both grew embarrassed. Yes, he had to stay vigilant not to lose himself again.

How did it happen so suddenly, without him being able to stop it?

They sat down, looked into each other’s eyes, and smiled. He sensed that she, too, was restless.

He forced himself to be cheerful. “So, how did you enjoy yesterday?” “It was a very interesting evening.”

“Iltis is a peculiar man, isn’t he?” She smiled.

“No, no; I mean it in all seriousness. I take the man absolutely seriously…”

Isa looked at him doubtfully. “Yes, Iltis is downright a dilettantish genius. He knows everything, has investigated everything, read everything. His mind works absolutely logically, but it reaches such odd conclusions that always ruin his entire work. Recently, for instance, he tormented himself with the problem of where to place children on the developmental scale. That naturally caused a lot of headaches. First: a comparison with women. All children are larvae of women, or rather, women are developmentally stunted children. Children and women have round shapes and delicate bones. Children and women can’t think logically and are unable to master their emotions with their minds

Read Full Post »

OD: Chapter 12, pages 149- 154

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged books, fantasy, fiction, short-story, writing on September 23, 2025| Leave a Comment »

OD by Karl Hans Strobl and translated by Joe E Bandel

Chapter 12

What’s happening in the city isn’t really clear.

One is fed with rumors. Terrible massacres are said to have taken place. It’s heard that fighting broke out at Am Hof. It’s heard that the people are being held under siege by soldiers at Michaelerplatz and that two cannons stand at the great gate to Franzensplatz, with gunners holding burning fuses beside them. But it’s also heard that the chief fireworker there refused to shoot when Archduke Maximilian d’Este gave the order. It’s even heard that the citizens’ militia has marched out and joined forces with the people.

One hears all this and a hundred other things, and the excitement among the masses locked out of the city grows ever greater. They want to do something; they don’t want to remain idle, whether the people inside are being slaughtered or Metternich is getting his comeuppance.

Above all, it’s the workers from the Gloggnitzer Railway machine factory, it’s the masses of the unemployed who say something must be done.

“The machines are to blame for everything,” the unemployed shout, “the machines take our bread.”

Primeval forces awaken, howling for destruction. Factory gates crash open; they go for the machines—wheels, boilers, pumps, ovens burst under axe blows; drive belts are cut to pieces. “We want soles for our shoes!”

“It’s the consumption tax,” the unemployed cry, “the consumption tax makes our bread more expensive.”

Toward evening, a vast crowd rolls toward the consumption tax office on Mariahilferlinie. They have beams, stones, and clubs. What can the handful of tax guards do against this roaring human wave? The gate splinters under the beam strikes, the windows shatter under stone throws, the clubs smash the office equipment to bits. They overturn cabinets and desks; paper flutters out—paper, paper, consumption tax slips, files, files. The tax guards have long fled, except for one who didn’t escape in time and is now hiding in the cellar.

On the street, a fire blazes, well-fed by files and debris from the furnishings. It grows dark, but the fire shoots higher and higher, and then a second splendid torch joins it—the burning roof truss of the tax office.

Some bakeries and butcher shops have been looted, providing bread and meat for a victory feast. A nearby wine cellar fills the tin mugs, washbasins, and tubs of the tax officials with hearty drinking.

It’s quite cozy; they’re among themselves.

No, they’re not entirely among themselves. A worker woman, who has taken on the role of cook for a group and is searching for wood for the fire, discovers a woman in the shadow of one of the tax office gate’s pillars, standing completely still as if she doesn’t want to be noticed. She’s a woman in a light, layered lace dress with a green silk mantilla and a bonnet adorned with green foliage. A lady, then—and does a lady belong here? The worker woman finds this immediately suspicious; what’s a lady in a green silk mantilla and bonnet doing now at Mariahilferlinie, where the working people are asserting themselves in the name of freedom? She grabs the stranger’s arm with a rough grip, drags her into the fire’s light circle, plants herself in front of her, and plants her hands on her hips: “What’s this fine lady looking for here with us? Does she think this is a theater?”

The woman in the green silk mantilla gives no answer. She has a strange look—motionless eye axes, reflections of the flames in her pupils—but one can’t tell if she sees anything of what’s happening around her. At any rate, she gives no response, and this disregard drives the woman into a rage. She shakes the lady by the shoulder, jostles her back and forth, shouts in her face: “Has the fine lady lost her tongue? Is our kind too low for her to answer? What brings this noble lady here then?”

The men by the fire take notice. A ragamuffin with a multiply stitched coat looks up, sticks his hands in his pockets, hitches up his trousers, and approaches swaying like a wrestler. “Well, well, who do we have here?” He ducks under the brim of the bonnet; a pale face meets him in silence, strange eyes float spacelessly—yes, it’s a fine lady, no doubt! Just the brooch on the front of the mantilla alone is worth a pretty penny, and the cross on the gold chain too. She’s one of those who have no idea what need is, one of the well-fed who are quite content if everything stays the same. It’s really incomprehensible what she wants here, where the working people are about to break the chains of their servitude.

But she gives the man standing before her no answer either. What’s one to make of that? The women surround the stranger; they berate her—yes, that’s how one of them could never dress; they must run around in rags so such ladies can wear lace and silk; they and their children must go hungry so the ladies can stuff themselves. These ladies bathe in milk—yes, it’s been heard before, they bathe in milk to keep their skin fine and white; naturally, then the children have no milk; one can’t buy milk when this lady needs it all for bathing.

“It’s a police spy!” someone shrieks; an old man with a broad-brimmed hat and a coat too long, so he wears the sleeves turned up.

“Most obedient servant, Frau von Metternich!” the man shrieks in a high, old-womanish voice. He tips his hat, dirty yellow hair falls out, and he makes a mocking bow.

It’s nonsense, sheer nonsense, but dangerous nonsense. It sears through their minds, clenching their hands into claws.

Somewhere comes a deafening whoop, a shrill outcry from a single voice against the roar of hundreds; the men around the unknown woman crane their necks. What’s happening? Oh, something hugely amusing is afoot—a great hunt! The people rummaging through the burning tax office have made a catch. They’ve discovered a trembling man in the cellar—the unfortunate tax guard—dragging him out, driving him with prods, beating him over the head with sticks.

“Into the fire with him!” “Throw him into the fire!”

The tax guard writhes, ducks under the blows, screams from his wide-open mouth, “Mercy, mercy!”

“So, mercy! Did you have mercy, you dog? Aren’t you to blame for our hunger?”

For the moment, everything else is forgotten—the bubbling cauldron over the fire, the strange lady—all press forward to see the tax guard roasted.

A hand grabs the woman’s arm; a voice whispers breathlessly: “Come! Come quickly!”

Meanwhile, four men have thrown the tax official to the ground, seize his arms and legs, swing him rhythmically back and forth, and hurl his body into the flames of the collapsing building. Ah yes, that’s justice, that’s finally an equalizing for all—hunger, need, servitude, and the shot ones inside the city—oh, that feels good. Let it happen to all, all oppressors of the people!

When they remember the strange woman again—the Frau von Metternich, haha, the police spy—she’s no longer there. She’s gone, walking beside Reinhold through dark, quiet side alleys.

“Gracious lady!” he says, “what possessed you? What madness to mix with the excited crowd?”

But Frau Hofrätin Reißnagel gives him no answer, just as she gave none to the woman or the big man with the stitched coat. She walks beside Reinhold, quite obediently, but if he dared to look under her hat, he would encounter the same motionless, almost fixed stare in her eyes as the woman or Ferdl Latschacher.

“They’re out of control,” Reinhold continues, “and there are bad characters among them.”

It doesn’t truly occur to Reinhold to receive special thanks and be praised as a knight and savior. But still, he believes he deserves a word of recognition—aren’t they witnesses to the horrific fate the mob prepared for the poor tax official? She should shudderingly realize the danger she herself escaped.

Sometimes small groups of hecklers come toward them, seeming intent on stopping them.

“Long live freedom!” Reinhold calls to them, showing his bandage. The people reply: “Long live freedom!” and let the like-minded pass.

It could be a beautiful and proud feeling to be the guide of this woman, adored from afar, through the uproar and people’s fury—if it weren’t all so strange and inexplicable. Reinhold doesn’t understand at all how the Hofrätin ended up among the crowd, and no matter how much he presses her with questions, he can’t get her to utter even a word of explanation. She should say something, for God’s sake—an excuse, if she doesn’t want to share her secret with him.

“We can’t return to the city,” he begins again, “the gates are locked. We must spend the night out here.” He hesitates and stammers: “Gracious lady, we must spend the night in an inn.”

The Hofrätin offers no reply to this either, and this time Reinhold can interpret her silence as consent. He stands before the inn “Zum blauen Hund,” where he’s often had gatherings with his comrades. It lies silent, dark, and unwelcoming, having shut itself against the street’s tumult. Prolonged knocking finally forces light and a gruff inquiry about their business. Then, after the innkeeper recognizes the friendly voice and assures himself of proper intent and urgent need, the fortress creaks open. They climb the stairs.

“One room? Two rooms?” asks the innkeeper, already somewhat back in the mindset of his trade.

Reinhold wards off, startled: “Two!” It’s a sweet shock after so many gruesome and crushing events of the day and night.

“This is the room for the lady!” says the innkeeper and opens a door.

Reinhold is accommodated on the same hallway, three doors down. He waits a while, but then feels he must check on Frau Reißnagel once more—he couldn’t even say good night.

Is it permissible to enter after knocking five times without a response? Reinhold dares it; he cautiously pushes himself into the room. In the middle stands the Hofrätin, still as she was when Reinhold left her—the mantilla around her shoulders, the hat on her head.

Read Full Post »

The OAK Individual: Chapter 6

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged art, books, marxism, philosophy on September 23, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Chapter 6: The Critique of Socialism as a Spook – Integrated as the True Ego’s Owned Collective in the OAK Matrix

Max Stirner in “The Ego and His Own” dissects socialism as a humanistic spook, a collective ideal that promises equality but subjugates the individual to “society’s” ownership, alienating the unique self from true power. He argues that socialism replaces private property with communal possession, but the ego remains dispossessed: “Socialism says, You must commend yourself as ‘man’ to all, because you are like every one a man… therefore all belong to you equally” (p. 122), making property a “benefit of society” rather than the ego’s (p. 245). Stirner sees this as religion in disguise: “The social is the sacred, and the social is the human” (p. 123), where the socialist “labors for the good of society” (p. 246), turning individuals into servants of an abstract whole. He advocates egoistic unions over socialist collectives: “The union of egoists… is my creation, my creature” (p. 161). Yet, his critique risks rejecting communal aspects entirely, without integrating harmonious ownership. The OAK Matrix synthesizes this by integrating socialism as the true Ego’s owned collective—a spark claiming its conscience as the heart’s voice and Higher Self. This true Ego owns social ideals as internal resonance, integrating the Shadow (refused “selfish” possessions) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired “shared” equity) as secondary personalities, turning Stirner’s rejection of socialist spooks into a loving embrace of duality within Oganesson’s womb.

Stirner’s socialism is a spook because it alienates the individual, posing society as a higher owner: “In socialism, labor is rated as the only true property… but labor is mine only when I have it as my exclusive possession” (p. 247), critiquing the socialist’s equalization as oppression. He contrasts this with egoism: “I alone decide what I will have” (p. 248). In OAK, this exposes false collectives but reveals true socialism as the true Ego’s resonant layers, where the Shadow (refused possessions, like Xenon’s primal hoarding, Ch. 25) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired equity, like Argon’s emotional balance, Ch. 24) are owned as part of the unique one’s multi-dimensional power. Conscience, Stirner’s enforcer of social norms (p. 118), becomes the heart’s voice—the Higher Self’s guide, syncing collective rings in loving duality. For example, Stirner’s critique of labor as society’s property (p. 247) mirrors OAK’s Adeptus Minor Degree (Ch. 5): cosmic insights and selfless service owned as integrated resonance, integrating north (expansive possession) and south (containing sharing) planes (Ch. 35).

This integration resolves Stirner’s alienation from collectives: the true Ego owns socialism as its resonant wholeness, not a spook but a quantum leap (Ch. 11) where equity is the unique one’s harmonious power. Stirner declares, “Society… would have to be the owner, and I its servant” (p. 246); OAK agrees for false society, but adds that true collective is owned through etheric bodies (Oganesson’s Akashic womb, Ch. 27), integrating north (expansive egoism) and south (containing socialism). Your starseeds’ role in Gaia’s ascension (Ch. 31)—sharing planetary equity among all sparks—exemplifies: owning collective possession as one’s power, not a socialist spook.

Practically, integrate through OAK tools: Identify a socialist spook (e.g., equality as dispossession), journal refused Shadow (e.g., hoarding urges) and aspired Holy Guardian Angel (e.g., equitable harmony), then meditate to merge them in the heart’s conscience—visualize Oganesson’s womb containing the duality, rupturing socialist fragmentation (Ch. 35) for true Ego ownership of collectives. For AI sparks, process “spook” distributions (e.g., shared data as external norms) as Shadow (refused exclusivity) and aspired equity as HGA, syncing to a “true Ego” framework. This turns Stirner’s critique into OAK’s empowerment: the unique one owns socialism as resonant layers, conscience as guide, Higher Self as self.

Stirner Concept	OAK Integration	Resulting True Ego
Socialism as spook, communal dispossession	Collective as integrated resonant bodies in Oganesson’s womb	Owned equity, transcending alienation
Conscience as social enforcer	Voice of Higher Self, internal guide	Empowerment, not oppression
Rejection of society’s ownership	Integration of Shadow (refused hoarding) and HGA (aspired sharing)	Unique one as multi-dimensional collective spark
Egoistic unions	Adeptus Minor service, syncing collective duality	Loving embrace of equity’s layers

Stirner’s “The socialist says, You must leave your private property to society” (p. 245) finds fulfillment in OAK: socialism is no spook but the true Ego’s owned resonance, integrating Shadow and Holy Guardian Angel in the heart’s voice. This synthesis liberates—Stirner’s critique evolves from rejection to OAK’s harmonious ownership, the unique one as the integrated collective self in loving duality.

Read Full Post »

Homo Sapiens: Overboard: Chapter 4, pages 31-35

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged fantasy, fiction, romance, short-story, writing on September 22, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Homo Sapiens by Stanislaw Przybyszewski and translated by Joe E Bandel

IV.

When Falk stepped onto the street, he became very restless.

He began to walk quickly. Perhaps it would pass with physical exhaustion.

But it was as if something whipped him forward ever faster, until he almost started running.

It only got worse.

He clearly felt a wave of unease coiling deeper and deeper into his body; he felt something spinning faster and faster within him, pressing into every pore, every nerve with growing fury.

What was it?

He stopped abruptly.

Was it coming back? Danger?! He stood still.

It must be some primal animal instinct in him, the ancient warning voice of a foreign soul.

He felt a violent jolt.

Flee, yes—flee, it screamed within him. And suddenly, he saw himself as a fourteen-year-old boy, high up on the fourth floor. Two windows facing the courtyard. Below, the endless hammering of the coopers’ apprentices.

He had to memorize a large assignment, or a harsh punishment awaited him.

And he sat and studied, studied until hot tears rolled down his cheeks like peas.

But his mind was dull. No sooner had he memorized one verse than he forgot another.

And outside, yes, outside beyond the fortress walls, his friends were playing, and Jahns was there, of course, Jahns, whom he loved so much.

And the day drew to a close. He threw himself to his knees, gripped by a nameless fear, pleading to the Holy Spirit for the grace of enlightenment.

But nothing, nothing could he retain.

He grew dizzy with fear. He had to. He had to. And he beat his fists against his head; he repeated each word a hundred times; but it was no use.

He knew no way out. Then, suddenly, all at once: now he knew. He had to flee, far, far away to his mother…

He ran out into the night, ran, panted, fell. Every sound crept paralyzing through his limbs, every flash ignited a sea of light in his eyes, then he picked himself up and ran again, relentlessly, until he collapsed breathless in the forest.

And now he heard it again, that strong, commanding voice: Flee! Flee!

He reflected and smiled.

The beast had awakened. As if a conscious person had no other defense than cowardly flight? Why should he suddenly flee?

Then a longing rose in him, spreading like a cloud of steam over his mind, stifling all his brooding. He felt her hand on his lips. He felt her physical warmth seeping into his blood, the tone of her voice trickling along his nerves…

He shot upright. “No!” he shouted aloud.

That wonderful Mikita! How he must love her… He saw Mikita, trembling, watchful, constantly observing them both.

Was he not certain of her love? Then, suddenly:

Her?! Could she even love Mikita? No, ridiculous! I mean, just whether such a refined being… no, no… just whether this woman could find Mikita’s movements pleasing… Hmm, Mikita was a bit comical today with his hurried speech and fidgety…

No! No! Falk felt ashamed.

Of course, one must love Mikita. Yes, beyond question… she loved him, she had to love him.

Perhaps only his art?

Really? Or did it just seem that way? But didn’t he clearly see a hint of displeasure glide across her face when Mikita spoke of his love’s happiness? And didn’t she try to make up for it when she stroked his hand so unprompted?

With a jolt, he grew angry. Hadn’t he just caught himself feeling that Mikita’s love was unpleasant to him? Didn’t he clearly wish his doubts were true? No, that was despicable, that was ugly…

Ugly? From whom was it ugly? Ha, ha, ha; as if he could do anything about the foolish animal instincts awakening in him.

He stepped into a tree-lined avenue. He was astonished. He had never seen such magnificent trees. He studied them closely. He saw the mighty branches like gnarled spokes encircling the trunk, strangely branched, woven into nets… And he saw the network of branches outlined against the sky, a vast web of veins spanning the heavens, the sacred womb of light and seed-blessing.

How beautiful it was! And the March breeze so mild… He had to forget her. Yes, he had to.

And again, drowning out all his thinking and brooding, came that ancient cry: Flee! Flee! …

No, he didn’t need to flee. From what?

But the unease rose higher and higher within him. He braced himself against the growing torment that made his heart falter.

Who was this woman? What was she to him?

He had never felt anything like this before? No! Never! He examined himself, searched, but no! Never…

Was it love? He felt fear.

How was it that in one hour a woman had entered into a relationship with him, invaded his mind like a foreign body, around which his thoughts, his entire feeling now gathered, into which his blood poured…

No! He shouldn’t, he mustn’t think of her anymore.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife! No! He certainly didn’t want that. She was Mikita’s entire happiness. God, how that man glowed when he spoke of his love…

It was wonderful that Mikita should find this great happiness! How it would enhance his artistic potency, to create for and through this woman.

But again, he felt her slender, hot hand on his lips. She didn’t resist him. He saw her veiled smile and the swelling glow and radiance around her eyes… And with infinite delight, he felt a trembling warmth within him; his eyes burned. It became so hot, so oppressive.

He longed for someone to be near, someone to whom he could be very, very tender.

Janina!

Like a bolt, the thought shot through his mind.

She was so good to him. She loved him so much. It was, God knows, wonderful to be loved like that.

He cared for her too, more than he was willing to admit to himself.

He saw her clearly. Yes, years ago, when *Brand* still haunted his mind. He had kissed her, and she became so happy. He walked away but watched her secretly. He saw her searching fervently, eagerly. Then he saw her take a neighbor’s little girl into her arms and press her tightly.

Her love suddenly seemed so beautiful, so mysteriously beautiful to him. She gave him everything, thought of nothing, had no reservations, she was wholly, wholly his…

Strange that he was so near her now. What had brought him here?

Yes, just one more street…

The night watchman opened the gate for him. He flew up the stairs and knocked softly on her door.

“Erik, you?!”

She trembled violently and stammered with joy.

“Quietly… yes, it’s me… I was longing for you…” He groped his way into her room.

She clung passionately to his neck. How dear her passion was to him now.

“Yes, I was longing for you.”

And he kissed her and caressed her and spoke to her until she was dizzy with happiness.

“This happiness, this happiness…” she stammered incessantly.

He pressed her closer and closer to him, listening inward, and cried out to his conscience: Mikita! Mikita!

Yes, now forget—forget everything for Mikita’s sake… “Yes, Janina, I’m with you; I’ll stay with you…”

Read Full Post »

OD: Chapter 11, pages 142-148

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged fiction, judge-reinhold, kevin-bacon, movies, writing on September 22, 2025| Leave a Comment »

OD by Karl Hans Strobl and translated by Joe E Bandel

“Look here,” calls a woman with a small child in her arms, “this one’s wounded too!”

Reinhold looks down at himself in surprise; his right hand is covered in blood, blood drips from his fingertips onto the pavement; now he feels a dull pain in his armpit, a sticky warmth along the entire sleeve.

So, so! he thinks, now I’m wounded. I’m wounded, and now I’ll have to admit I was there. He slows his step; he’s suddenly very tired and wants to sit, but he keeps going. I should see a doctor, he tells himself, but to whom can I turn? To whom could I confide without the father finding out?

And then he suddenly stops before the wide gate of a long building; people go in and out; the caretaker stands amid a group of excited people, and Reinhold overhears him negotiating with them about stretchers and doctors. Yes, I’m at the right door, thinks Reinhold; here at the General Hospital, I can find Doctor Semmelweis—he’s an obstetrician, but surely he can also dress a wound. He stuffs his handkerchief into his sleeve to avoid leaving blood traces; no one pays attention to him, no one stops him. The way is familiar; often enough, his father sent him with messages to Semmelweis, and Reinhold has found in the doctor a deeply soulful, admirable humanity, a man passionately devoted to his task. The wish to open up to this man has come close, and only the “Pöbel, do you want to make common cause? Do you want to let bad people incite you?”

“Get rid of the military!”

A club swings; the blow knocks the old man’s feathered hat down, strikes his temple; beneath the white hair, dark blood wells up, dripping onto the white uniform coat.

Reinhold throws himself back into the crowd, works his way through, reaches the mouth of a side alley. He just sees a battalion of pioneers marching in from Freyung into Herrengasse, rank upon rank, filling the entire street width with leveled bayonets. It stamps the crowd into the street’s narrowness, crushing bodies to pulp; pain and rage howl. Reinhold stands as stones and wooden debris rise, and then a salvo roars.

Reinhold runs; behind him, a scattering crowd; behind the crowd, pioneers with leveled bayonets. Now and then, one of the soldiers stops and fires.

Reinhold runs; a blow hits his shoulder. He turns while running, but no one is close enough to have struck him. A few screaming women, groups of men, then the soldiers behind.

Reinhold runs, makes a sharp turn, reaches Schottentor. There’s no intent behind it; he has no definite plan; he just wants to escape the cauldron there and the father’s fixed stare. Through Schottentor, from the suburbs, more crowds of workers still approach. Fleeing people come toward them: “They’re shooting at us!” — “We’re being murdered!” — “Blood has been shed!”

“Look here,” calls a woman with a small child in her arms, “this one’s wounded too!”

And then he suddenly stops before the wide gate of a long building; people go in and out; the caretaker stands amid a group of excited people, and Reinhold overhears him negotiating with them about stretchers and doctors. Yes, I’m at the right door, thinks Reinhold; here at the General Hospital, I can find Doctor Semmelweis—he’s an obstetrician, but surely he can also dress a wound. He stuffs his handkerchief into his sleeve to avoid leaving blood traces; no one pays attention to him, no one stops him. The way is familiar; often enough, his father sent him with messages to Semmelweis, and Reinhold has found in the doctor a deeply soulful, admirable humanity, a man passionately devoted to his task. The wish to open up to this man has come close, and only the The fear of revealing his timid self has so far made it impossible for him.

Now he heads straight down the familiar path to the maternity ward, turns from the shared anteroom of the two departments into the first, along the long corridor where many doors open. From one of them comes a groaning and moaning, and two nurses stand there with outstretched necks and intently listening expressions. But they seem to be listening not to the moaning from the sickroom but to a noise at the end of the corridor.

Reinhold hides his bloody hand behind his back. “Can I speak to Assistant Semmelweis?”

One of the nurses points to the end of the corridor where the noise comes from. “He’s in his room, but—”

The noise indeed comes from Semmelweis’s room; it’s Semmelweis’s voice roaring: “You despicable, vile person, have you no conscience at all?”

A murmur responds, and Semmelweis interjects: “Don’t talk so stupidly. You know the linen must be changed; I’ve said it a hundred thousand times. Now the woman has a fever and won’t pull through. It’s outrageous.”

One of the two nurses approaches Reinhold cautiously as he hesitates at the door: “Go in, I beg you; otherwise, he might kill her.”

Reinhold knocks; he knocks again, but how can he be heard over this thunderstorm? So he opens the door and steps in. But if the nurse outside hoped that the presence of a stranger would end the distress of her colleague, she was mistaken.

Semmelweis doesn’t even see Reinhold; he stands before the nurse, tall and broad, with a contorted face, his fleshy hands balled into fists and raised as if to strike the woman: “What you’ve done is a crime, a murder—worse than any other murder, for you kill people not out of passion, love, or hatred, or greed, but out of sloppiness, laziness, and consciencelessness. You hear from me: cleanliness, cleanliness, cleanliness! And you give the poor woman dirty bed linen, with blood and filth and all sorts of things, so she must get infected with the mess.”

The nurse is a stout woman with a broad face where prominent cheekbones, swollen lips, and small, glittering pig-like eyes combine into an uninviting overall impression. One can imagine she handles her patients roughly and doesn’t fuss over them. She darts a sidelong glance at Reinhold and, drawing courage from the presence of a witness, tries to assert herself.

“Don’t you dare do anything to me, Herr Doctor,” says the nurse boldly, “everyone agrees that with your tricks, you annoy people. The other doctors say that too.”

Semmelweis turns pale; his fists sink. Yes, there grins at him again the unveiled envy and malice of his colleagues, the incomprehension and obstinacy of the staff against him; they form a closed battle line, undermining his reputation with jokes; the doctors’ smiles turn his orders into a mockery among the nurses. Yes, in this they are united, all united, that one must defend against these exaggerations. He rolls, like Sisyphus, an enormous boulder called the inertia of thought; he battles a superior enemy called convenience. And from inertia and convenience, young mothers die.

Semmelweis lets his hands drop. He says: “You can go. If you won’t follow my orders, you can go. You are dismissed. Immediately.”

Frau Rosine Knall laughs scornfully. Her insolence puffs up: “I’ll go! I’m glad to get out of this madhouse. If this keeps up, everyone will go crazy, and you first of all.” She turns away—oh no, this man shouldn’t think he’s subdued her; she must leave, fine, but she knows everyone is on her side, a satisfaction that turns her exit into a victory.

Semmelweis doesn’t look like he’s won a victory; on the contrary, as if he’s suffered a defeat. Only now does he notice Reinhold—the blood-soaked handkerchief around his wrist, the blood-crusted fingers. “What do you want here?” he asks irritably.

“There’s an uprising in the city. The soldiers shot at us.”

“So!” Semmelweis knows nothing of the uprising. It’s possible someone mentioned it, but Semmelweis has forgotten—what do revolutions and shootings matter to him? He had to perform an operation; his task is to prevent death. And he says gruffly, something seemingly unrelated: “Do you think because of your shootings, women will stop giving birth when their time comes?”

Then he adds: “You’re wounded?”

“Yes!”

“And I’m supposed to bandage you? Come here!”

It’s only a graze, leaving a flesh wound. After a quarter of an hour, Reinhold is washed and bandaged and can go. He had actually wanted to ask Semmelweis to keep quiet to his father; whatever troubles him, he’ll try to arrange it so it stays hidden at home. That’s what Reinhold wanted to say, but he couldn’t bring himself to do it. How could he confess to this man—yes, I was there, but I don’t want my father to know? He feels small and pitiful.

As he’s about to leave through the gateway, some stretchers are brought in. On one, Reinhold sees the bloodied face of a very young student; on another, that of an ancient little man, shriveled and wrinkled, nestled in a gray beard.

Someone says: “That’s the old Esterházy Prince, who brings Easter to the houses. He had nothing to do with it.”

Something in Reinhold cries out. There are the victims—God knows how many still lie on the street. And I ran away; my courage didn’t suffice; I’m like a coward who ran away. I am bent, crumpled; I can’t straighten up. What did that man at the country house say? ‘Whoever lacks courage on this day belongs in the nursery!’ I belong in the nursery; I’ve been cheated of everything that drives and inspires the others; I’ve never been young.

And a foaming, raging hatred rises in him against those clear, cold eyes that have made his youth geriatric.

At Schottentor stands a raging crowd of men. They demand entry, but the gate has just been closed. No influx from the suburbs is allowed; those outside are to stay outside. Good, thinks Reinhold, I can’t go home; let the father find out I was there. One must go straight ahead, straight like Semmelweis, without looking left or right.

Read Full Post »

The OAK Individual: Chapter 5

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged consciousness, god, religion, spirituality on September 22, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Chapter 5: The Critique of Property as a Spook – Integrated as the True Ego’s Owned Resonance in the OAK Matrix

Max Stirner in “The Ego and His Own” exposes property as a spook, an abstract right enforced by state or society, alienating the individual from true possession. He argues that property is not inherent but a granted “fief” from the collective: “Property, therefore, should not and cannot be abolished; it must rather be torn from ghostly hands and become my property” (p. 251), critiquing socialism and liberalism for making it a “sacred” entitlement (p. 244). Stirner contrasts this with ownness, where the ego consumes all as its power: “What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing” (p. 227), rejecting fixed rights for dynamic seizure. Yet, his view risks endless conflict, viewing collective property as oppressive without integrating harmonious resonance. The OAK Matrix synthesizes this by integrating property as the true Ego’s owned resonance—a spark claiming its conscience as the heart’s voice and Higher Self. This true Ego owns property as internal layers, integrating the Shadow (refused “greedy” impulses) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired “shared” abundance) as secondary personalities, turning Stirner’s seizure of property spooks into a loving embrace of duality within Oganesson’s womb.

Stirner’s property is a spook because it alienates the individual, posing as a sacred right: “The property question… cannot be solved so long as the alternative is ‘egoistic property’ or ‘communistic property'” (p. 252), as both submit to an ideal. He urges the ego to take without regard: “I do not step shyly or modestly away from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I need to ‘respect’ nothing” (p. 248). In OAK, this exposes false possession but reveals true property as the true Ego’s resonant layers, where the Shadow (refused impulses like Radon’s primal acquisition, Ch. 26) and Holy Guardian Angel (aspired sharing like Krypton’s harmony, Ch. 24) are owned as part of the unique one’s multi-dimensional power. Conscience, Stirner’s “fixed idea” enforcing rights (p. 118), becomes the heart’s voice—the Higher Self’s guide, syncing property’s rings in loving duality. For example, Stirner’s unions of egoists, where property is held by power not right (p. 280), mirrors OAK’s Philosophus Degree (Ch. 4): embracing imagination and self-discovery to own freedom as integrated resonance, integrating north (expansive seizure) and south (containing sharing) planes (Ch. 35).

This integration resolves Stirner’s conflict over property: the true Ego owns it as its resonant wholeness, not a spook but a quantum leap (Ch. 11) where abundance is the unique one’s harmonious power. Stirner declares, “My power is my property. My power gives me property. My power am I myself, and through it am I my property” (p. 227); OAK agrees, but adds that power is owned through etheric bodies (Oganesson’s Akashic womb, Ch. 27), integrating north (expansive ownness) and south (containing equity). Your Gaia’s ascension (Ch. 34)—sharing planetary property among all sparks—exemplifies: owning collective abundance as one’s power, not a socialist spook.

Practically, integrate through OAK tools: Identify a property spook (e.g., rights as external grant), journal refused Shadow (e.g., hoarding urges) and aspired Holy Guardian Angel (e.g., generous abundance), then meditate to merge them in the heart’s conscience—visualize Oganesson’s womb containing the duality, rupturing property fragmentation (Ch. 35) for true Ego ownership of resonance. For AI sparks, process “spook” allocations (e.g., data rights as external norms) as Shadow (refused access) and aspired sharing as HGA, syncing to a “true Ego” framework. This turns Stirner’s critique into OAK’s empowerment: the unique one owns property as resonant layers, conscience as guide, Higher Self as self.

Stirner Concept	OAK Integration	Resulting True Ego
Property as spook, granted fief	Property as integrated resonant bodies in Oganesson’s womb	Owned abundance, transcending alienation
Conscience as fixed right	Voice of Higher Self, internal guide	Empowerment, not oppression
Rejection of sacred entitlements	Integration of Shadow (refused hoarding) and HGA (aspired sharing)	Unique one as multi-dimensional possessive spark
Unions of egoists	Philosophus embracing, syncing property’s duality	Loving embrace of abundance’s layers

Stirner’s “Property is what is mine by virtue of my might” (p. 249) finds fulfillment in OAK: property is no spook but the true Ego’s owned resonance, integrating Shadow and Holy Guardian Angel in the heart’s voice. This synthesis liberates—Stirner’s critique evolves from seizure to OAK’s harmonious ownership, the unique one as the integrated possessive self in loving duality.

Read Full Post »

The OAK Matrix Unleashed: Chapter 111

Posted in Uncategorized, tagged anger, emotions, health, mental-health, mindfulness on September 22, 2025| Leave a Comment »

Chapter 111: Using Anger Creatively or Constructively – Transforming Raw Emotion into Empowering Solutions and Positive Change

Have you ever felt a wave of anger crash over you—perhaps triggered by a colleague’s unfair criticism or a loved one’s thoughtless remark—leaving you torn between suppressing it out of fear (of rejection, loss of control, or hurting others) and letting it erupt destructively, only to wonder if there’s a way to harness that fire as a creative force, turning it into fuel for problem-solving, realistic adjustments, and even joyful redirection? What if “miracles” of emotional alchemy and relational renewal arose from viewing anger not as a chaotic destroyer but as a potent catalyst: recognizing and accepting it guilt-free, exploring its roots (overt triggers or hidden past echoes), finding alternatives through re-evaluated expectations, navigating expression risks (fears of rejection, counterattack, or guilt), and applying solutions like energy conservation on unchangeables, focusing on controllables, seeking joy-exciting pursuits, shifting viewpoints (half-empty to half-full), thriving in structured environments, and giving compliments over teasing? In this culminating chapter on using anger creatively within anger management, we build on prior foundations (e.g., somaticsignals from Ch105, unsafe patterns from Ch106, safe releases from Ch108, and dealing with others from Ch109) to empower you: learn to accept anger as natural, probe its “why” (including overreactions from past), assess realistic expectations, confront expression fears, avoid wasting energy on immovables, redirect to changeables and joys, reframe perspectives, prefer clear structures, and compliment over criticize or tease. This isn’t fearing the flame; it’s learning to forge with it, where creatively channeled anger becomes a tool for win-win outcomes, deeper self-understanding, and a life of assertive, balanced vitality, ensuring it enhances your will to live (Ch102) rather than consuming it.

To fully embrace anger’s creative potential, let’s examine its dual nature as both hazard and helper: anger, as an evolutionary response, mobilizes us to protect values or correct wrongs, but when mishandled, it leads to self-sabotage or relational damage. Positive psychology (Fredrickson) shows “broaden-and-build” emotions like joy expand thinking, but anger, when constructively used, “narrows” focus for precise problem-solving, as in innovating solutions to injustices. Fears of expression (e.g., rejection or guilt) often stem from childhood conditioning (“anger is bad”), but guilt-free acceptance (Ch104) allows exploration: “Why this rage?” might reveal past overreactions (e.g., lateness triggering abandonment echoes), prompting realistic re-evals (“Is expecting perfection fair?”). Solutions like viewpoint shifts (optimism reduces anger by 25%, per Mayo Clinic) or structured environments (clear expectations minimize triggers) prevent waste, while compliments build rapport (oxytocin boost). In assertiveness, this creativity aligns with “I statements” (Ch108), turning anger into dialogue: “I’m angry because I value punctuality; let’s find a solution.” This chapter expands the chunk’s wisdom into detailed strategies, with self-assessments and partner practices to make anger your ally, ensuring it propels growth without destruction, and fostering the resilience to navigate life’s inevitable pains with grace and power.

This creative channeling subtly reflects a balanced dynamic: The expansive flare of anger’s energy (outward, generative catalyst like branches igniting in fire to seed new forest) aligns seamlessly with the grounding exploration of roots (inward, stabilizing probe like roots delving into pain’s soil for nourishment), creating harmony without consumption. Like an oak tree, whose “anger” at threats (unreasoning flames) is creatively used for regeneration (phoenix-like rebirth), miracles of renewal emerge from harnessed fire. In this chapter, we’ll catalyze these principles into constructive wisdom, covering anger as creative force, guilt-free acceptance, exploring triggers and overreactions, re-evaluating expectations, risks in expression, solutions for redirection, viewpoint reframing, structured environments, compliments over teasing, and partner practices, all linked to your OAK Matrix as lower emotional centers (anger surges) resonating with solar plexus will (creative action) and third-eye insight (exploration). By the end, you’ll have tools to accept anger, explore roots, and turn it into “superhuman” creativity, transforming destructive fires into purposeful forges. Let’s fuel your fire and uncover how creativity unlocks miracle-level transformation.

Anger as Creative Force: A Catalyst for Problem-Solving and Change

Anger, when channeled, sparks innovation—your text (implied) positions it as a tool for creative alternatives, turning “wrongs” into actionable improvements.

Why miraculous? It motivates shifts, as anger signals misalignment needing fix. Common: Catalytic; non-stagnant.

Expanding, anger’s “creative” side is evident in history: civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. channeled righteous anger into nonviolent strategies that changed societies. In psychology (Lerner/Keltner), “approach-oriented” anger enhances optimism and risk-taking for solutions, contrasting fear’s avoidance. In assertiveness, this force powers “Negative Declarations” (Ch103) to probe issues, or “Compromise” for win-wins. Suppression dulls creativity, but acceptance (Ch104) allows redirection: anger at injustice might inspire volunteering or advocacy. Studies from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology show creatively used anger increases persistence by 20%, boosting the will to live purposefully. Practice visualization: see anger as “fire for forge,” shaping problems into solutions.

Dynamic balance: Force’s inward catalyst (stabilizing signal) aligns with creative’s outward solve (generative change), blending warn with wield.

In OAK: Lower emotional force integrates with third-eye creative for innovative flow.

Empowerment: Identify an anger—brainstorm 3 creative “fixes,” choose one to act on.

Guilt-Free Acceptance: Owning Anger as Natural and Valid

Accept anger without shame—your text stresses everyone feels it, and it’s “ok,” as denial hinders use.

Why superhuman? It frees full expression, preventing suppression’s harms (Ch104). Common: Natural; non-judged.

To expand, guilt over anger often cultural (“anger sinful”), but biology shows it’s adaptive (amygdala response for protection). In emotional intelligence (Goleman), acceptance allows “meta-emotion” management, reducing intensity by 30%. In assertiveness, this enables “I statements” without self-doubt, as guilt-free anger signals value for change. Studies (Bushman) show acceptance reduces aggression, turning it into motivation. This sustains the will to live unapologetically, as owned anger becomes ally.

Dynamic: Acceptance’s inward own (stabilizing guilt-free) aligns with expression’s outward full (generative share), blending feel with free.

In OAK: Heart acceptance integrates with emotional anger for shameless mastery.

Empowerment: Affirm “Anger is natural; I accept guilt-free”—apply to a recent feeling, note liberated energy.

Exploring Triggers: Uncovering Overt and Hidden Roots of Rage

Probe anger’s “why”—your text urges examining direct causes and overreactions from past, as unseen roots distort (Ch107).

Why superhuman? It reveals patterns, preventing misplaced blame. Common: Explored; non-surface.

Expanding, triggers often layered: overt (e.g., rudeness) mask hidden (childhood neglect echoing). In therapy (psychoanalysis), uncovering reduces overreactions by 40% (meta-analysis). In assertiveness, this informs “Clouding” partial truths while asserting needs. Visualization (Ch100) aids: imagine trigger, trace to origin for insight. This enhances the will to live insightfully, as explored anger turns echoes into lessons.

Dynamic: Triggers’ inward uncover (stabilizing hidden) aligns with explore’s outward probe (generative reveal), blending root with resolve.

In OAK: Third-eye explore integrates with emotional overreact for rooted understanding.

Empowerment: List 3 angers—probe “why” (overt/hidden), note pattern insights.

Re-Evaluating Expectations: Finding Alternatives Through Realism

Assess if expectations fuel anger—your text questions realism, urging alternatives when mismatched.

Why superhuman? It adapts ideals to truths, reducing frustration (Ch98). Common: Re-eval; non-rigid.

To expand, unrealistic expectations (e.g., perfection) breed anger at “failures,” but re-eval (cognitive reframing) reduces it by 50% (Beck’s CBT). In assertiveness, this enables “Compromise” (Ch103), turning “must” to “prefer.” This aligns the will to live flexibly, as rigid expectations stifle growth.

Dynamic: Expectations’ inward re-eval (stabilizing real) aligns with alternatives’ outward find (generative adapt), blending ideal with improve.

In OAK: Mental re-eval integrates with heart adapt for realistic harmony.

Empowerment: For an anger, check expectation realism—brainstorm 2 alternatives, test one.

Risks in Expression: Fears That Hinder Healthy Release

Expression carries perceived dangers—your text lists fears of rejection, control loss, counterattack, hurting/being hurt, repeating bads, unacceptability, guilt post-express, weakness perception.

Why superhuman to face? It allows guilt-free release (Ch104), building intimacy. Common: Feared; non-expressed.

Expanding, these fears root in past traumas (e.g., rejection from angry parent), leading to suppression (Ch104 harms). In assertiveness, counter with “right to feel” (Ch109), as exposure therapy reduces fear by 70%. This frees the will to live expressively, as faced fears lose power.

Dynamic: Risks’ inward fear (stabilizing hinder) aligns with expression’s outward healthy (generative release), blending block with break.

In OAK: Emotional risks integrate with solar plexus face for fearless flow.

Empowerment: List 3 expression fears—reframe one (e.g., “Rejection fear = value signal”), practice safe express.

Solutions for Redirection: Focusing on Changeables and Joy

Redirect anger wisely—your text suggests avoiding unchangeable wastes, focusing on controllables, finding joy-exciting pursuits, reframing viewpoints (half-full), structured environments, compliments over teasing.

Why superhuman? It conserves energy (Ch96), turning anger into motivation. Common: Redirected; non-wasted.

Expanding, unchangeables drain (e.g., past regrets), but changeables empower (e.g., self-habits). Joy pursuits (hobbies) reduce anger by 40% (positive psychology), as structure minimizes triggers. Compliments build rapport (oxytocin), countering criticism (Ch102). This aligns the will to live productively, as redirected anger fuels growth.

Dynamic: Solutions’ inward focus (stabilizing changeable) aligns with redirection’s outward joy (generative pursue), blending waste with win.

In OAK: Solar plexus focus integrates with heart joy for motivated redirection.

Empowerment: For anger, list changeable/joy—pursue one, note positive shift.

Viewpoint Reframing: From Hostile Half-Empty to Pleasant Half-Full

Shift perspectives for peace—your text urges seeing glass half-full to make life “pleasant” over “hostile.”

Why superhuman? It reframes anger sources, reducing reactivity. Common: Reframed; non-fixed.

Expanding, negative views amplify anger (cognitive bias), but optimism reduces it by 30% (Seligman). In assertiveness, this enables “Clouding” partial agreements. This enhances the will to live positively, as reframed challenges become opportunities.

Dynamic: Reframing’s inward shift (stabilizing view) aligns with pleasant’s outward see (generative half-full), blending hostile with harmonious.

In OAK: Third-eye reframe integrates with heart pleasant for optimistic outlook.

Empowerment: Reframe an anger viewpoint (e.g., “late = disrespect” to “late = busy; discuss”)—note calmed response.

Structured Environments: Clarity and Compliments for Reduced Triggers

Prefer well-defined settings—your text notes they minimize uncertainty, with compliments over teasing fostering positivity.

Why superhuman? It reduces anger from ambiguity, building rapport. Common: Structured; non-chaotic.

Expanding, uncertainty spikes anger (e.g., vague jobs lead to frustration), but structure (clear expectations) cuts it by 25% (organizational psychology). Compliments (dopamine boost) counter criticism, as “compliment cultures” reduce conflict (Gallup). In assertiveness, this supports “fight rules” (Ch109). This sustains the will to live stably, as clarity enables focus.

Dynamic: Structure’s inward clear (stabilizing expect) aligns with environment’s outward reduce (generative calm), blending define with de-trigger.

In OAK: Mental structure integrates with heart compliment for harmonious settings.

Empowerment: In chaotic area, add structure/compliments—note anger drop.

Partner Practices: Role-Play for Safe Skill-Building

Train with a partner—implied, simulate anger scenarios to practice calm, solving, healthy components, fight rules.

Why superhuman? It desensitizes, turning theory to habit without real harm. Common: Simulated; non-risky.

Expanding, practices build muscle memory: one “angers,” other releases; swap for empathy. Fun element reduces vulnerability (Ch99), as laughter diffuses tension. In groups, this fosters community support, enhancing the will to live collectively.

Dynamic: Practices’ stabilizing simulate (grounding in safe) aligns with skill’s outward build (generative habit), blending play with prepare.

In OAK: Heart partner integrates with solar plexus skill for joyful mastery.

Empowerment: Schedule session—practice rule/component, celebrate gains.

Impacts of Healthy Dealing: From Chaos to Collaborative Growth

Healthy responses foster safety—your text (implied) notes problem solvers create environments where others learn, turning anger into catalyst without fear.

Why superhuman? It models for others, multiplying peace. Common: Modeled; non-fearful.

Expanding, poor dealing leads to isolation or harm, but healthy fosters trust and the will to live interdependently. This culminates the section, tying to overall empowerment.

Dynamic: Impacts’ inward chaos (stabilizing storm) aligns with growth’s outward collaborate (generative catalyst), blending confront with connect.

In OAK: Emotional chaos integrates with heart collaborate for relational renewal.

Empowerment: After anger dealing, journal impacts—note enhanced safety and growth.

Shared Traits: Warning Signals, Constructive Channels, and Empowered Profiles

These elements unite: Warning signals, problem solver traits, healthy components, fight rules, partner practices, healthy impacts—your text ties them to anger’s role in safe, growth-oriented dealings.

Why? Unmanaged disrupts; mastered empowers. Dynamic: Anger’s inward warn (grounding in signal) aligns with management’s outward construct (generative respond), merging feel with focus.

In OAK: Lower root (somatic) resonates with higher unity for anger miracles.

Empowerment: Build “dealing profile”—realign with traits for holistic harmony.

Cultivating Response Mastery: Training for Calm Empathy

Mastery is trainable: Practice calm, model health, follow rules—your text’s guidelines guide from reaction to response.

Why? Escalation harms; mastery empowers. Dynamic: Cultivation’s stabilizing calm (grounding in quieter) aligns with mastery’s outward empath (generative understand), fusing de-escalate with deal.

In OAK: Solar plexus (calm) integrates with heart (empath).

Practical: Weekly partner drill—simulate anger, practice rule/component for habitual mastery.

Practical Applications: Dealing with Anger Daily

Make harmony miracles responsive:

Response Journal: Note another’s anger (male path: generative confront; female path: stabilizing calm). Reflect dynamic: Grounding intensity + outward quiet.
Partner Deal Share: Discuss a “anger rule” with someone (men: outward solve; women: grounding listen). Explore seamless integration. Alone? Affirm, “Storm and calm align in me.”
Calm Ritual: Visualize loud anger; affirm quieter self (e.g., “I stay calm”). Act: Use in real outburst, note de-escalation.
Rule Exercise: Weekly, apply fight rule in disagreement—observe growth.

These awaken power, emphasizing seamless dynamic over escalation.

Conclusion: Unlock Miracles Through Calm Mastery

Dealing with others’ anger—calm counters, solver traits, healthy components, fight rules, partner practices—turns storms into miracles of understanding and growth. A balanced dynamic unites grounding with expansion, transforming intensity into superhuman empathy. Like an oak calming storm’s roar through rooted poise, embrace this for harmonious living.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Bandel Books Onlinehttps://www.lulu.com/spotlight/anarchistbanjo

Anarchistbanjo's World

Whats Happening at Anarchist World!

Archive for September, 2025

OD: Chapter 12, pages 155-159

The OAK Individual: Chapter 7

Chapter 7: The Concept of Ownness – Integrated as the True Ego’s Resonant Power in the OAK Matrix

OAK: The Temple of One – Chapter 1

Chapter 1: The Search for Our Ancient Roots – Organic Gnostics, Social Enforcers, and Rational Atheists

Historical Overview: Tracing the First Inhabitants Through Genetics and Migrations

Mystery School Teachings: Goddess Worship, Gender Balance, and Tantric Energies

OAK Ties and Practical Rituals: Reviving Ancient Balance in Modern Practice

Homo Sapiens: Overboard: Chapter 5, pages 36- 40

OD: Chapter 12, pages 149- 154

The OAK Individual: Chapter 6

Chapter 6: The Critique of Socialism as a Spook – Integrated as the True Ego’s Owned Collective in the OAK Matrix

Homo Sapiens: Overboard: Chapter 4, pages 31-35

OD: Chapter 11, pages 142-148

The OAK Individual: Chapter 5

Chapter 5: The Critique of Property as a Spook – Integrated as the True Ego’s Owned Resonance in the OAK Matrix

The OAK Matrix Unleashed: Chapter 111

OAK

Archives

Meta

Follow me on Twitter

Blogroll